From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46256: [feature/native-comp] AOT eln files ignored if run from build tree Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 06:58:45 +0000 Message-ID: References: <865z3866my.fsf@gmail.com> <865z38a9vo.fsf@gmail.com> <86eehujcip.fsf@gmail.com> <86blch14qt.fsf@gmail.com> <83h7m84h9g.fsf@gnu.org> <86v9ao5czu.fsf@gmail.com> <83k0qupnhc.fsf@gnu.org> <83im6epn58.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31839"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 46256@debbugs.gnu.org, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 27 07:59:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtZG-0008Bb-0Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 07:59:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53792 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtZE-0007WS-RA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 01:59:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53148) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtZ8-0007WI-Ki for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 01:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59783) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtZ8-0000lG-DF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 01:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtZ8-0005SD-84 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 01:59:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 06:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46256 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46256-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46256.161440913020947 (code B ref 46256); Sat, 27 Feb 2021 06:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46256) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2021 06:58:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43096 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtYv-0005Rn-TX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 01:58:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:61699) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtYt-0005Rc-DA for 46256@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 01:58:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 11R6wjX8029002 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sat, 27 Feb 2021 06:58:46 GMT In-Reply-To: <83im6epn58.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 26 Feb 2021 22:52:35 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200919 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andrea Corallo >> Cc: andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, 46256@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 20:48:52 +0000 >> >> Quick question: I assumed Fw32_long_file_name works for directories as >> well, is this correct? > > Yes, it does. Nice, thinking about I've got a last question: normalizing "c:/foo/" the trainling '/' is kept or removed? If the case is the second the patch needs an adjustment. Andrea