From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#52912: 29.0.50; Left over files from native compilation Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 14:16:25 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87pmotxrgs.fsf@gnus.org> <87ilui76ox.fsf@gnus.org> <83y238m5h1.fsf@gnu.org> <87y238kqfs.fsf@gnus.org> <83r190m4is.fsf@gnu.org> <87tudwkpsl.fsf@gnus.org> <83pmokm43a.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmokkoee.fsf@gnus.org> <83k0esm2kp.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnisj8lu.fsf@gnus.org> <83ilucm1id.fsf@gnu.org> <875yqbbwhm.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13987"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 52912@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 24 15:17:36 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nC0A2-0003PS-VV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 15:17:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37168 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nC0A1-0008Nv-96 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:17:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nC09W-0008Lu-Mi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49753) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nC09W-0004ws-CB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nC09V-0005OV-Vc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:17:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 14:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52912 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 52912-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52912.164303378919152 (code B ref 52912); Mon, 24 Jan 2022 14:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 52912) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2022 14:16:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42654 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nC08z-0004yf-5v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:16:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:60398) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nC08w-0004vl-In for 52912@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:16:28 -0500 Original-Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 20OEGPIM009710 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Mon, 24 Jan 2022 14:16:25 GMT In-Reply-To: <875yqbbwhm.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 22 Jan 2022 16:50:29 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:225053 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> No, you are not misreading. I guess my hypothesis was incorrect, and >> something else is at work here. But the problem is real nonetheless. >> >> Perhaps this is something caused by Alan's speedup of the bootstrap? > > Could be, but it's affecting a whole lot more files than the ones that > were touched by that change... Andrea, can you take a look at this? Hi Lars, Hmmm I see what's going on. The .eln file is produced by 'gcc_jit_context_compile_to_file', we could just produce the temporary .elc before calling it and renaming it afterwards but unfortunatelly 'gcc_jit_context_compile_to_file' takes a considerable part of the compilation time, as a consequence we'd go back to the reason this bug was opened for. I think the best solution is to touch the .eln file once the final .elc is produced. I'll put a patch together. Andrea