From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#60996: 29.0.60; Native compile fails to remove temp file for trampoline Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 13:56:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: <74d13c46-5b26-9dd8-45dc-32b7fda25421@gmail.com> <833583ks9t.fsf@gnu.org> <86tu0iwx49.fsf@gmail.com> <83a629i3aj.fsf@gnu.org> <83r0vhcf9m.fsf@gnu.org> <83o7qlcbc4.fsf@gnu.org> <835ycsceta.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40906"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, 60996@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 27 14:57:22 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pLPEG-000ASK-Ew for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:57:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pLPE3-0007KT-0r; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:57:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pLPDy-0007KE-RP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:57:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pLPDy-0005Kd-Jh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:57:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pLPDy-00042P-8n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:57:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 13:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 60996 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 60996-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B60996.167482780215486 (code B ref 60996); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 13:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 60996) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2023 13:56:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36948 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pLPDe-00041i-BY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:56:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:59794) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pLPDZ-00041U-GU for 60996@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:56:40 -0500 Original-Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 30RDuaMJ025574 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 13:56:36 GMT In-Reply-To: <835ycsceta.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 27 Jan 2023 15:00:49 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:254258 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Cc: andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, 60996@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 22:03:39 +0200 >> From: Eli Zaretskii >> >> > But my question is: is this mechanism _really_ necessary? >> > >> > >From my POV it's just a kludge that was, is and will be source of >> > problems. Was never clear to me for which specific reason this was >> > implemented as, at the time, I had the impression that all Debian >> > requirements could be handled with what we already offered. >> > >> > At the time I firmly opposed to this change, but I was told by Lars it >> > went into master "for discussion" (!?), indeed the review discussion >> > never happened... and now we are left with this present. >> > >> > Unless we have a very strong reason to keep it, I believe we should just >> > get rid of this mechanism, otherwise it will be source of pain for us >> > again and again in the future. >> >> I'll have to refresh my memory about the reasons and the actual >> changeset. > > I started a discussion on emacs-devel about this, let's see where it > leads us. Thanks > I think for now I should simply wrap the delete-file call at the end > of 'comp--native-compile' with 'ignore-errors'. WDYT? Yeah agree, I'm fine with that as a temporary solution. I hope we'll not forget it there as definitive and we'll be able come up with a decision on this. Best Regards Andrea