From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47067: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] Crash while scrolling through dispnew.c Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 07:31:14 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83sg52lykn.fsf@gnu.org> <83czw4lelg.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtv8jgn2.fsf@gnu.org> <834khfjv7q.fsf@gnu.org> <83tupfia1m.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtv7hy5c.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0qbhvnh.fsf@gnu.org> <83czw3hu5f.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0qagtfe.fsf@gnu.org> <83im5ugpym.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38691"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: pipcet@gmail.com, 47067@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 14 08:32:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lLLEW-0009yU-4o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:32:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41442 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLLEU-0008J6-Po for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:32:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52146) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLLEI-0008J0-U1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:32:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49564) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLLEI-0004VJ-KT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:32:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLLEI-0000CQ-Fe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:32:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 07:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47067 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47067-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47067.1615707079709 (code B ref 47067); Sun, 14 Mar 2021 07:32:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47067) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Mar 2021 07:31:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32877 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLLDa-0000BN-SP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:31:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:56841) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLLDX-0000BC-Tn for 47067@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:31:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 12E7VE8h010468 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sun, 14 Mar 2021 07:31:15 GMT In-Reply-To: <83im5ugpym.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 14 Mar 2021 09:21:53 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:202340 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andrea Corallo >> Cc: pipcet@gmail.com, 47067@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 06:53:01 +0000 >> >> > If someone can send a patch, I could try it. TIA. >> >> Should be what Pip suggested here >> > > Shouldn't that bump the ABI number as well? Right good point I think it should. Anyway thinking about: this should be good for a quick test maybe removing (or renaming) the discussed .eln. But if it proves this to be the bug you'll have to rebuild from scratch to have a reliable system anyway , as the ABI number will not cover us for the native code that was already dumped with the image. Thanks Andrea