From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 20:33:49 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> <83im3x2pp3.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7jh2p31.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsz12oyb.fsf@gnu.org> <83eeel2mfv.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1450"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 05 22:34:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leODh-0000El-M7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 22:34:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58450 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leODg-0006PG-Ne for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 16:34:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59504) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leODa-0006P7-Dk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 16:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51008) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leODa-0007Gb-6T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 16:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leODa-0004Fy-3w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 16:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 20:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48221 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 48221-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48221.162024683616356 (code B ref 48221); Wed, 05 May 2021 20:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 20:33:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34321 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leODU-0004Fk-G7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 16:33:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:65461) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leODO-0004Fc-Ty for 48221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 16:33:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 145KXnS8027750 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 5 May 2021 20:33:49 GMT In-Reply-To: <83eeel2mfv.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 05 May 2021 19:08:04 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:205737 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andrea Corallo >> Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 15:23:47 +0000 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> >> Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 18:10:58 +0300 >> >> From: Eli Zaretskii >> >> Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> >> >> Thanks. I think the feature should be renamed to native-comp >> > >> > Sorry, I meant native-compile. >> >> NP, BTW in the configure we use `native-compilation' shouldn't we use >> this? > > I thought native-compile was better because we talked about renaming a > bunch of variables to have that prefix, so it would be consistent. Okay, I've the impression we all agreed on native-compile for the feature name so I did the renaming with 40736357b8. The configure flag in any case is a different subject. Thanks Andrea