From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46495: 28.0.50; [native-comp] Build fails for 32bit --with-wide-int Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 13:10:49 +0000 Message-ID: References: <86y2fq93zj.fsf@gmail.com> <83lfbqbq3g.fsf@gnu.org> <868s7pwvq8.fsf@gmail.com> <28FB9567-61E6-4083-8711-6CF6C8A493F4@gnu.org> <86o8gjheaw.fsf@gmail.com> <865z2p0zrq.fsf@gmail.com> <86pn0w59nj.fsf@gmail.com> <83y2eap33a.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5064"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, 46495@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 26 14:11:18 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lPmF9-0001A0-9v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:11:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40530 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPmF8-0001Yt-BM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:11:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35306) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPmEx-0001Y0-MS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:11:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57301) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPmEw-0007r0-AO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:11:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lPmEw-0003Qo-5L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 13:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46495 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46495-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46495.161676425313175 (code B ref 46495); Fri, 26 Mar 2021 13:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46495) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2021 13:10:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40614 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lPmEn-0003QR-L1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:10:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:61956) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lPmEl-0003QG-Ex for 46495@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:10:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 12QDAnkK016026 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Fri, 26 Mar 2021 13:10:50 GMT In-Reply-To: <83y2eap33a.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:27:21 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:203047 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Cc: 46495@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:18:55 +0000 >> From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, >> the Swiss army knife of text editors" >> >> Eli, how do you find the current branch stability on 32bit wide-int? > > It looks in good shape, AFAICT. Very nice. > One issue left, which I'm pursuing locally, is the one with strange > gaps in the C backtraces. You can see the traces of that on the > gdb-patches mailing list. When I finish that investigation, hopefully > next week, we will be able to see whether this is some bug in the > native-comp branch or just lack of debug info; in the latter case I > will probably ask for changing the default debug-level in comp.el, at > least on MS-Windows. > > Stay tuned. Sure, I've seen some of that (interesting reading), thanks for looking into this. Andrea