From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48029: 28.1; [native-comp] Function names with non-ascii characters Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 14:24:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: <877dkp2zr6.fsf@miha-pc> <874kfliksx.fsf@gnus.org> <87bkua8fga.fsf@gnus.org> <8335fh9lah.fsf@gnu.org> <87bku0g6h7.fsf@gnus.org> <83pmig40s4.fsf@gnu.org> <838rp34w1o.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7xx3z3r.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsj915p1.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24540"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 48029@debbugs.gnu.org, jakanakaevangeli@chiru.no To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 12 16:26:16 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oBGq8-00069w-MQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 16:26:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37880 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oBGq7-0006Vz-EF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:26:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53718) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oBGow-0006Tp-E7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:25:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49484) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oBGow-0001AB-4v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oBGow-0002OP-1p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 14:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48029 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 48029-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48029.16576358849171 (code B ref 48029); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 14:25:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48029) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2022 14:24:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43381 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oBGoe-0002Nq-5K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:24:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:54497) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oBGoc-0002Ng-9X for 48029@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:24:42 -0400 Original-Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 26CEOaDC017772 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 14:24:36 GMT In-Reply-To: <83fsj915p1.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 10 Jul 2022 16:02:34 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:236802 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen >> Cc: Andrea Corallo , 48029@debbugs.gnu.org, >> jakanakaevangeli@chiru.no >> Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2022 14:56:40 +0200 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> > To the release branch, if Lars agrees. But let's first try to see if >> > bug#45433 is not back after the above change. >> >> If it doesn't regress bug#45433, then it's fine by me. > > Andrea says he cannot reproduce bug#45433 even if he removes the fix > entirely. I guess some other change fixed it. Correct. I think we should come to a conclusion on the branch to target so we can push the fix we already have and maximize its verification. BR Andrea