From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47067: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] Crash while scrolling through dispnew.c Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 19:30:31 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83sg52lykn.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtv8lrmf.fsf@gnu.org> <83czw4lelg.fsf@gnu.org> <835z1wl6ao.fsf@gnu.org> <831rckl56k.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9207"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 47067@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 12 20:52:33 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKnpo-0002I9-Gc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 20:52:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60684 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKnpn-0005mj-JU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:52:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35450) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKnV1-0003li-85 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:31:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKnV0-00085c-W5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:31:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKnV0-0007Pi-SJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:31:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 19:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47067 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47067-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47067.161557743627005 (code B ref 47067); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 19:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47067) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2021 19:30:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58432 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKnUZ-000719-Hm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:30:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:53089) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKnUX-0006xt-7r for 47067@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:30:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 12CJUVfg012533 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 19:30:31 GMT In-Reply-To: <831rckl56k.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 12 Mar 2021 18:14:59 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:202200 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andrea Corallo >> Cc: 47067@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:08:33 +0000 >> >> > In my case the top of the stack looks like this: >> > >> > #0 0x01236788 in arithcompare_driver (nargs=2, args=0x28, >> > comparison=ARITH_LESS) at data.c:2673 >> > #1 0x01236860 in Flss (nargs=2, args=0x28) at data.c:2691 >> > #2 0x0a872285 in ?? () >> > #3 0x01261898 in funcall_lambda (fun=XIL(0xa00000000a0bf230), nargs=5, >> > arg_vector=0x826a08) at eval.c:3292 >> > #4 0x012601ed in Ffuncall (nargs=6, args=0x826a00) at eval.c:3013 >> > #5 0x0a8e0dbf in ?? () >> > #6 0x012601ed in Ffuncall (nargs=1, args=0x826bd8) at eval.c:3013 >> > #7 0x0a8ce041 in ?? () >> > #8 0x01261898 in funcall_lambda (fun=XIL(0xa0000000069f2a50), nargs=1, >> > arg_vector=0x826db8) at eval.c:3292 > > Btw, what are those "??" there instead of function names? Do you see > the same on your system? Yes I think too they are in place of function names. You could verify if the address is mapped by an .eln file. I do not see those in my back-traces so it might a bug of the Windows toolchain? Andrea