From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#52833: native compilation fails on teco.el from MELPA Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 10:59:29 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87wnjo935r.fsf@gnus.org> <83o850lpr0.fsf@gnu.org> <87czktuqn0.fsf@gnus.org> <831r19181i.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19676"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , mark.t.kennedy@gmail.com, 52833-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 17 12:00:16 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n9PkG-0004vK-9M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 12:00:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52694 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9PkF-0001nI-Am for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 06:00:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37030) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9Pk3-0001j1-GC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 06:00:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51967) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9Pk3-00024Y-29 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 06:00:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n9Pk3-000719-19 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 06:00:03 -0500 Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 11:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 52833 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Mail-Followup-To: 52833@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org, mark.t.kennedy@gmail.com Original-Received: via spool by 52833-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D52833.164241718826895 (code D ref 52833); Mon, 17 Jan 2022 11:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 52833-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2022 10:59:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44864 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n9Pjn-0006zh-1i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 05:59:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:55608) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n9PjW-0006zK-SJ for 52833-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 05:59:46 -0500 Original-Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 20HAxTfk020464 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Mon, 17 Jan 2022 10:59:29 GMT In-Reply-To: <831r19181i.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 15 Jan 2022 14:46:01 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:224436 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen >> Cc: mark.t.kennedy@gmail.com, 52833@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org >> Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2022 13:31:31 +0100 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> >> > I've installed a fix on master as e7699bf290, please have a look if it >> >> > works for you as well. >> >> > >> >> > Maintainers will tell us if we want to backport it on emacs-28 as well >> >> > (I think would be worth). >> >> >> >> If it doesn't lead to any regressions on master, backporting it to >> >> emacs-28 sounds like a good idea to me. >> > >> > Agreed, let's revisit this in a week or two. >> >> It's now been two weeks, so should this be backported now? > > I won't object to backporting it. > >> (I can't recall seeing any regressions, but I haven't paid that much >> attention the past few weeks.) > > Neither did I. Hi all, I then pushed the backport into emacs-28 as 9e64aeff40. Closing this. Thanks! Andrea