From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46495: 28.0.50; [native-comp] Build fails for 32bit --with-wide-int Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:06:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: <86y2fq93zj.fsf@gmail.com> <83lfbqbq3g.fsf@gnu.org> <868s7pwvq8.fsf@gmail.com> <28FB9567-61E6-4083-8711-6CF6C8A493F4@gnu.org> <86o8gjheaw.fsf@gmail.com> <865z2p0zrq.fsf@gmail.com> <86pn0w59nj.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28867"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 46495@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andy Moreton Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 19 17:07:21 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lD8JN-0007Oy-Oa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:07:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39762 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD8JM-0006QS-Mb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:07:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53998) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD8J4-0006Mf-Rm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:07:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38674) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD8J4-0003rm-Jg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:07:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lD8J4-0007iw-Dw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:07:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46495 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46495-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46495.161375082029682 (code B ref 46495); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46495) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2021 16:07:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50220 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lD8J1-0007ig-UF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:07:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:62918) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lD8Iy-0007iV-6x for 46495@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:06:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 11JG6tom022152 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:06:55 GMT In-Reply-To: <86pn0w59nj.fsf@gmail.com> (Andy Moreton's message of "Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:01:36 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200355 Archived-At: Andy Moreton writes: > On Fri 19 Feb 2021, Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" wrote: > >> The patch is not affecting GCC9 as initially was reported to be working. >> If you suspect also 9 is affected you can trivially modify the patch to >> take effect on 9 too. > > I tried a clean rebuild after modifying the patch to appy for gcc9. > No difference - the compile processes still crash. > > Debugging this further will have to wait for Eli or some other > interested person who uses this platform to investigate this issue. Agree. BTW it might be as well that a new bug was introduced with the recent changes, I'll have another 32bit wide-int try in the weekend. Andrea