From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46670: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] possible miscompilation affecting lsp-mode Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 19:33:12 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87a6ry46uc.fsf@collares.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40098"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 46670@debbugs.gnu.org, Mauricio Collares To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 26 20:34:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lFisR-000ALI-Ry for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 20:34:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55582 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFisQ-0000zM-Td for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:34:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40272) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFisF-0000yV-C0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:34:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59250) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFisE-00048I-HG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:34:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFisE-0003pu-EY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 19:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46670 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46670-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46670.161436799914691 (code B ref 46670); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 19:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46670) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2021 19:33:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42562 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFirX-0003ot-6W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:33:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:50793) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFirV-0003ol-KP for 46670@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:33:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 11QJXCwp027916 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 19:33:12 GMT In-Reply-To: (Pip Cet's message of "Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:59:41 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200883 Archived-At: Pip Cet writes: >> On this subject I highly recommend the following, let's adopt what we >> essentially do for GCC development: > > You might want to suggest that on emacs-devel, as it would be a very > drastic change. If you, as an individual, want to stop responding to > bug reports that don't meet your strict criteria, I don't think > there's anyone trying to stop you. Just define a nice keyboard macro > saying "I'm sorry, you need to jump through these hoops first". > >> If this rules are not followed is just too difficult and, above all, >> expensive from a time prespective to review. This way of proceeding is >> just the only sustainable. > > I try to avoid speaking in absolutes like that. There's more than one > way to do it. > >> We probably should document these points somewhere. > > We should probably discuss and agree on them first. Sorry I realized I've been not clear, I was only talking about native compiler misscompilation bugs. There's no need to suggest or discuss that, this is how I work and will as long as I maintain the native compiler. Andrea