From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46824: 28.0.50; nativecomp crash with cl-block/cl-defun Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:02:40 +0000 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10898"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 46824@debbugs.gnu.org, Aaron Jensen To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 01 10:13:00 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lGebr-0002hv-Pc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 10:12:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36192 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGebq-0007Hl-PJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 04:12:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51338) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGeSE-0006a1-Hh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 04:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36480) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGeSE-0004wi-7p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 04:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGeSE-0002xw-38 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 04:03:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46824 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46824-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46824.161458936611374 (code B ref 46824); Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46824) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2021 09:02:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48026 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGeRx-0002xO-N6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 04:02:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:61843) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGeRv-0002xE-RO for 46824@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 04:02:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 12192ek2026948 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Mon, 1 Mar 2021 09:02:41 GMT In-Reply-To: (Pip Cet's message of "Sun, 28 Feb 2021 06:36:06 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201065 Archived-At: Pip Cet writes: > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 6:13 AM Pip Cet wrote: >> Andrea, is it possible to modify the code so _setjmp is called >> directly rather than through a function pointer? > > This patch, which I hasten to add is not for inclusion and hasn't been > tested against the test suite, might fix the problem (on non-Windows > systems. I'm afraid this problem is something that Windows actually > got right and Unix got wrong...) It does here, experimentally. > > I'd appreciate it if someone could test further. I haven't looked into the patch but the approach sounds like a good idea to me. Can we have the version of the patch you'd like to have included? Thanks Andrea