From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47067: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] Crash while scrolling through dispnew.c Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 21:07:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83sg52lykn.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtv8lrmf.fsf@gnu.org> <83czw4lelg.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtv8jgn2.fsf@gnu.org> <834khfjv7q.fsf@gnu.org> <83tupfia1m.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtv7hy5c.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0qbhvnh.fsf@gnu.org> <83czw3hu5f.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8153"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 47067@debbugs.gnu.org To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 13 22:08:17 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lLBUf-00020n-8A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 22:08:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40226 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLBUd-0007qp-Ol for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 16:08:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39032) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLBUQ-0007qV-O5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 16:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49247) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLBUQ-0000lw-Gg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 16:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLBUQ-0008FB-AJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 16:08:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 21:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47067 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47067-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47067.161566967731678 (code B ref 47067); Sat, 13 Mar 2021 21:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47067) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Mar 2021 21:07:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60793 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLBUL-0008Es-A7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 16:07:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:60164) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLBUK-0008Ek-0s for 47067@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 16:07:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 12DL7tik029580 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sat, 13 Mar 2021 21:07:55 GMT In-Reply-To: (Pip Cet's message of "Sat, 13 Mar 2021 21:00:05 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:202308 Archived-At: Pip Cet writes: > On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 8:53 PM Andrea Corallo wrote: >> One confirmation that the issue is the one suggested by Pip would be >> running the test we added for this with like: > > Andrea, are you aware of any reason not to call setjmp directly on Windows? No I'm not, as I don't see a reason to do it probably we should just go for the direct call as we do for other systems. Andrea