From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57880: 28.1; Emacs crashes with native compilation on when some antivirus program is running on MS-Windows Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 08:09:19 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83bkr7ud5k.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38594"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: ioannis.kappas@gmail.com, 57880@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 22 10:10:32 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1obHI0-0009up-34 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:10:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51424 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1obHHz-0005l5-3O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 04:10:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53082) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1obHHX-0005kL-7f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 04:10:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37089) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1obHHW-0002rS-JP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 04:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1obHHW-0003tx-Ed for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 04:10:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 08:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57880 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57880-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57880.166383416414926 (code B ref 57880); Thu, 22 Sep 2022 08:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57880) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Sep 2022 08:09:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36161 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1obHGt-0003sg-Mw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 04:09:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:65163) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1obHGr-0003sV-4g for 57880@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 04:09:22 -0400 Original-Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 28M89JTJ017812 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Thu, 22 Sep 2022 08:09:19 GMT In-Reply-To: <83bkr7ud5k.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 22 Sep 2022 09:38:31 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:243403 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Cc: 57880@debbugs.gnu.org >> From: Andrea Corallo >> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 19:26:08 +0000 >> >> Okay, I think then is a good idea to guard against the NULL pointer >> potentially returned, OTOH we do it already in the rest of the code. >> >> I'm only not sure if we should signal an error or not here. > > No, we shouldn't, IMO. We should just behave as if the *.eln files > were unavailable, perhaps with some message logged in *Messages*. > Signaling an error would be shooting the user in his/her foot, because > loading of *.eln files is attempted as part of routine operation, so > signaling an error will prevent the user from being able to invoke > many commands. Agree. Andrea