From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45900: 28.0.50; [PATCH] [native-comp] Improve backtraces from async workers Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 12:40:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11788"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 45900-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Phil Brown Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 16 13:41:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l0ktF-0002y5-Gn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 13:41:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36424 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l0ktE-00061N-IN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 07:41:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47990) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l0kt5-00061B-DE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 07:41:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59238) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l0kt3-0004pL-Su for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 07:41:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l0kt3-00043S-QG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 07:41:01 -0500 Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 12:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 45900 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Mail-Followup-To: 45900@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org, p.brown.phil@gmail.com Original-Received: via spool by 45900-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D45900.161080085615565 (code D ref 45900); Sat, 16 Jan 2021 12:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45900-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2021 12:40:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42549 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l0ksy-00042y-3H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 07:40:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:57497) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l0ksv-00042m-9U for 45900-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 07:40:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 10GCeoOe027990 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sat, 16 Jan 2021 12:40:51 GMT In-Reply-To: (Phil Brown's message of "Fri, 15 Jan 2021 10:19:37 -0800") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:198022 Archived-At: Phil Brown writes: > Hi bug list, > > I've been happily using the native-comp branch and it works well. Attached is a tiny change to set > `backtrace-line-length' in comp.el's async workers. I was debugging a few failed compilations and had run `(setq > backtrace-line-length 0)` in an attempt to see the full path of the offending files (turned out to be autoloads). The > setting was having no effect on the async compile errors and I realized the batch-mode worker processes weren't > inheriting it. > > I haven't signed CA papers since this change is so small, but am happy to if that's needed. > > Thanks! > -Phil Hi Phil, thanks for the patch! In as 88100bed0a. My suggestion would be to do the CA paperwork anyway as might be handy for the future :) Closing Thanks Andrea