From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46495: 28.0.50; [native-comp] Build fails for 32bit --with-wide-int Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:33:43 +0000 Message-ID: References: <86o8gjheaw.fsf@gmail.com> <865z2p0zrq.fsf@gmail.com> <86pn0w59nj.fsf@gmail.com> <83y2eap33a.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfa6kl8s.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7ktlwuy.fsf@gnu.org> <65e12b1d547420e10a19cdad6a33198926abb527.camel@redhat.com> <8335wdknbw.fsf@gnu.org> <83im58k8rb.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfa3iqv3.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0pniq1n.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24288"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, dmalcolm@redhat.com, 46495@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 31 12:34:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lRYAs-00062P-Ab for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:34:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41614 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRYAr-0005sx-Bw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:34:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60872) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRYAk-0005qY-7f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42009) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRYAj-00015q-UK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:34:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRYAj-0004h2-Qa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:34:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46495 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46495-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46495.161718682718021 (code B ref 46495); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46495) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Mar 2021 10:33:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53555 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRYAV-0004ga-C4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:33:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:64161) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRYAT-0004gS-Nb for 46495@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:33:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 12VAXhbt000570 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:33:43 GMT In-Reply-To: <83k0pniq1n.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 31 Mar 2021 13:19:16 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:203344 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 13:01:36 +0300 >> From: Eli Zaretskii >> Cc: andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, dmalcolm@redhat.com, 46495@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> For some reason, compiling files with batch-native-compile does NOT >> produce the message that I'm used to see with >> batch-byte-native-compile-for-bootstrap: >> >> libgccjit-0.dll: note: disable pass tree-isolate-paths for functions in the range of [0, 4294967295] > > Oh, I see: it's because batch-native-compile runs the final > compilation phase in a subprocess. But doesn't that mean the > non-default setting of comp-debug will not have its effect in this > case? `comp-debug' at that point is captured in the compilation context `comp-ctxt', we have a slot for that in the structure. > Btw, I find the doc strings of the various top-level native-compile > functions not very helpful when I need to understand under what > circumstances they run the compilation asynchronously. I always need > to read the code, and read it carefully, to figure that out. Can this > please be improved? Sure, if you have a list of the one that you have found troublesome (and/or some suggestion) I'll try to improve them. Thanks Andrea