From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62609: 29.0.60; [PATCH] src/comp.c: New variable `comp-el-to-eln-strip-prefix` for `comp-el-to-eln-rel-filename` Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2023 14:08:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: <835yadw3f7.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2705"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 62609@debbugs.gnu.org, lin Sun To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 03 16:09:12 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pjKrw-0000Vt-I9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 16:09:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pjKrn-0007he-Ip; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 10:09:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pjKrm-0007hQ-AO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 10:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pjKrm-0001jo-2E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 10:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pjKrl-0002BL-SQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 10:09:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2023 14:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62609 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 62609-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62609.16805309218358 (code B ref 62609); Mon, 03 Apr 2023 14:09:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62609) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Apr 2023 14:08:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44915 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pjKrQ-0002Ak-QC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 10:08:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:52067) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pjKrO-0002Aa-Ew for 62609@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 10:08:38 -0400 Original-Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.16.1/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 333E8aM6023039 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Mon, 3 Apr 2023 14:08:36 GMT In-Reply-To: <835yadw3f7.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 03 Apr 2023 15:33:48 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259183 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: lin Sun >> Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:53:18 +0000 >> >> You're right, the patch will allow to relocate/copy an elisp source folder from >> /home/userA/.emacs.d/epla/**.el to >> /home/userB/.emacs.d/epla/**.el. >> So the patch should be the >> "0002-New-variable-comp-el-to-eln-strip-prefix-for-comp-el.patch" >> attached in this email. >> >> And agree with you, it's dangerous when this variable is configured >> with an arbitrary value. >> So please feel free to close this ticket. Thanks > > I'd like to hear what Andrea thinks about this, before I decide > whether to close. Hi all, I agree we should not add a new knob in order to move eln-cache without moving the source *.el. The use-case sounds like a corner case and this new variable would be IMO very sensitive to miss configurations. Best Regards Andrea