* bug#4440: 23.1.50; Add .dx32fsl to completion-ignored-extensions
@ 2009-09-15 14:36 Leo
2009-09-15 15:14 ` Juanma Barranquero
2009-09-25 11:42 ` Juanma Barranquero
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Leo @ 2009-09-15 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-pretest-bug
Please describe exactly what actions triggered the bug
and the precise symptoms of the bug:
I am surprised to see that .dx64fsl is on completion-ignored-extensions
while .dx32fsl is not.
'.dx32fsl' is produced by 32 bit clozure-cl¹. So I'd propose to add it
to the list.
Best wishes,
Leo
Footnotes:
¹ http://ccl.clozure.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* bug#4440: 23.1.50; Add .dx32fsl to completion-ignored-extensions
2009-09-15 14:36 bug#4440: 23.1.50; Add .dx32fsl to completion-ignored-extensions Leo
@ 2009-09-15 15:14 ` Juanma Barranquero
2009-09-15 18:51 ` Leo
2009-09-25 11:42 ` Juanma Barranquero
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2009-09-15 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leo; +Cc: 4440
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 16:36, Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am surprised to see that .dx64fsl is on completion-ignored-extensions
> while .dx32fsl is not.
>
> '.dx32fsl' is produced by 32 bit clozure-cl¹. So I'd propose to add it
> to the list.
There is also .p32fsl and .d32fsl, similar to .p64fsl and .d64fsl? Or
aren't these two from MCL / Clozure?
Juanma
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* bug#4440: 23.1.50; Add .dx32fsl to completion-ignored-extensions
2009-09-15 15:14 ` Juanma Barranquero
@ 2009-09-15 18:51 ` Leo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Leo @ 2009-09-15 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juanma Barranquero; +Cc: 4440
On 2009-09-15 16:14 +0100, Juanma Barranquero wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 16:36, Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am surprised to see that .dx64fsl is on completion-ignored-extensions
>> while .dx32fsl is not.
>>
>> '.dx32fsl' is produced by 32 bit clozure-cl¹. So I'd propose to add it
>> to the list.
>
> There is also .p32fsl and .d32fsl, similar to .p64fsl and .d64fsl? Or
> aren't these two from MCL / Clozure?
I don't know where those two extensions are from. I have recently
switched to CCL and realise dired displays .dx32fsl.
>
> Juanma
--
Leo's Emacs uptime: 1 minute, 47 seconds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* bug#4440: 23.1.50; Add .dx32fsl to completion-ignored-extensions
2009-09-15 14:36 bug#4440: 23.1.50; Add .dx32fsl to completion-ignored-extensions Leo
2009-09-15 15:14 ` Juanma Barranquero
@ 2009-09-25 11:42 ` Juanma Barranquero
2009-09-30 10:00 ` Leo
2011-07-13 13:39 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2009-09-25 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leo; +Cc: 4440
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 16:36, Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am surprised to see that .dx64fsl is on completion-ignored-extensions
> while .dx32fsl is not.
>
> '.dx32fsl' is produced by 32 bit clozure-cl¹. So I'd propose to add it
> to the list.
Apparently, OpenMCL / Clozure uses different extensions for fasl
according to target architecture:
http://ccl.clozure.com/ccl-documentation.html#building-definitions
The attached patch adds them all, though I think they're a bit too
much. Any way to know which of these are commonly used?
Juanma
Index: lisp/bindings.el
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/emacs/emacs/lisp/bindings.el,v
retrieving revision 1.225
diff -u -2 -r1.225 bindings.el
--- lisp/bindings.el 14 Sep 2009 23:28:43 -0000 1.225
+++ lisp/bindings.el 22 Sep 2009 13:43:44 -0000
@@ -602,7 +602,10 @@
;; CMUCL
".x86f" ".sparcf"
- ;; Other CL implementations (Allegro, LispWorks, OpenMCL)
- ".fasl" ".ufsl" ".fsl" ".dxl" ".pfsl" ".dfsl"
- ".p64fsl" ".d64fsl" ".dx64fsl"
+ ;; OpenMCL / Clozure CL
+ ".dfsl" ".pfsl" ".d64fsl" ".p64fsl" ".lx64fsl" ".lx32fsl"
+ ".dx64fsl" ".dx32fsl" ".fx64fsl" ".fx32fsl" ".sx64fsl"
+ ".sx32fsl" ".wx64fsl" ".wx32fsl"
+ ;; Other CL implementations (Allegro, LispWorks)
+ ".fasl" ".ufsl" ".fsl" ".dxl"
;; Libtool
".lo" ".la"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* bug#4440: 23.1.50; Add .dx32fsl to completion-ignored-extensions
2009-09-25 11:42 ` Juanma Barranquero
@ 2009-09-30 10:00 ` Leo
2011-07-13 13:39 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Leo @ 2009-09-30 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juanma Barranquero; +Cc: 4440
On 2009-09-25 12:42 +0100, Juanma Barranquero wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 16:36, Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am surprised to see that .dx64fsl is on completion-ignored-extensions
>> while .dx32fsl is not.
>>
>> '.dx32fsl' is produced by 32 bit clozure-cl¹. So I'd propose to add it
>> to the list.
>
> Apparently, OpenMCL / Clozure uses different extensions for fasl
> according to target architecture:
>
> http://ccl.clozure.com/ccl-documentation.html#building-definitions
>
> The attached patch adds them all, though I think they're a bit too
> much. Any way to know which of these are commonly used?
>
> Juanma
>
> Index: lisp/bindings.el
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/emacs/emacs/lisp/bindings.el,v
> retrieving revision 1.225
> diff -u -2 -r1.225 bindings.el
> --- lisp/bindings.el 14 Sep 2009 23:28:43 -0000 1.225
> +++ lisp/bindings.el 22 Sep 2009 13:43:44 -0000
> @@ -602,7 +602,10 @@
> ;; CMUCL
> ".x86f" ".sparcf"
> - ;; Other CL implementations (Allegro, LispWorks, OpenMCL)
> - ".fasl" ".ufsl" ".fsl" ".dxl" ".pfsl" ".dfsl"
> - ".p64fsl" ".d64fsl" ".dx64fsl"
> + ;; OpenMCL / Clozure CL
> + ".dfsl" ".pfsl" ".d64fsl" ".p64fsl" ".lx64fsl" ".lx32fsl"
> + ".dx64fsl" ".dx32fsl" ".fx64fsl" ".fx32fsl" ".sx64fsl"
> + ".sx32fsl" ".wx64fsl" ".wx32fsl"
> + ;; Other CL implementations (Allegro, LispWorks)
> + ".fasl" ".ufsl" ".fsl" ".dxl"
> ;; Libtool
> ".lo" ".la"
Many thanks for investigating this further. Unfortunately I am not too
familiar with ccl. I changed from sbcl to ccl because threads are better
supported in ccl on OSX. Could you ask in gmane.lisp.openmcl.devel?
Leo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* bug#4440: 23.1.50; Add .dx32fsl to completion-ignored-extensions
2009-09-25 11:42 ` Juanma Barranquero
2009-09-30 10:00 ` Leo
@ 2011-07-13 13:39 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2011-07-13 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juanma Barranquero; +Cc: 4440, Leo
Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com> writes:
> The attached patch adds them all, though I think they're a bit too
> much. Any way to know which of these are commonly used?
I've now applied your patch to Emacs 24.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-13 13:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-09-15 14:36 bug#4440: 23.1.50; Add .dx32fsl to completion-ignored-extensions Leo
2009-09-15 15:14 ` Juanma Barranquero
2009-09-15 18:51 ` Leo
2009-09-25 11:42 ` Juanma Barranquero
2009-09-30 10:00 ` Leo
2011-07-13 13:39 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).