From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2584: 23.0.91; Void variable diary-view-holidays-initially-flag Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:52:28 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310262815 7164 80.91.229.12 (10 Jul 2011 01:53:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 01:53:35 +0000 (UTC) To: 2584-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 10 03:53:27 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfjD0-0004nY-Fv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 03:53:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49784 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfjCz-0000R3-LO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:53:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47151) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfjCi-0000Qb-19 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:53:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfjCg-0004jl-LM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:53:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42416) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfjCg-0004ja-C1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfjCg-0001on-4m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:53:02 -0400 Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 01:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 2584 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: unreproducible moreinfo Mail-Followup-To: 2584@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 2584-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D2584.13102627556949 (code D ref 2584); Sun, 10 Jul 2011 01:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2584-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jul 2011 01:52:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfjCF-0001o2-3z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:52:35 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfjCD-0001np-SN for 2584-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:52:34 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60678) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfjC8-0005gO-EY; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:52:28 -0400 X-Spook: counter intelligence Cocaine SHA Medco CNCIS strategic X-Ran: 44u2Vh'%ZHT'_U|ORK2?[zsVf_[p!"015+90QV+r-/9%F7V9$2l2LcuI*jW[tT;61Zi=Tl X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Fri, 06 Mar 2009 09:42:45 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:53:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48423 Archived-At: I'm closing this; I cannot see how it could happen. If you get a recipe to reproduce it, please reopen the report. Leo wrote: > I have encountered this at least twice. However, it can not be easily > reproduced either with 'emacs' or 'emacs -Q'. I noticed that the > variable definition was in calendar.el after posting this. But now it > just looks even more strange.