From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David.Kastrup@t-online.de (David Kastrup) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: Bug#139792: emacs21: Press PageDown, get infinite loop Date: 16 Apr 2002 12:21:30 +0200 Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1018953011 2680 127.0.0.1 (16 Apr 2002 10:30:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 10:30:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16xQDy-0000h6-00 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 12:30:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16xQE4-00027b-00; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 06:30:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout07.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.83]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16xQBK-0001zA-00 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 06:27:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fwd02.sul.t-online.de by mailout07.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 16xQ5t-0005OP-07; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 12:21:49 +0200 Original-Received: from tupik.goethe.zz (520018396234-0001@[62.226.12.152]) by fwd02.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 16xQ5e-2IVBOSC; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 12:21:34 +0200 Original-Received: (from dak@localhost) by tupik.goethe.zz (8.11.6/linuxconf) id g3GALUA01453; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 12:21:30 +0200 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 32 X-Sender: 520018396234-0001@t-dialin.net Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:697 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:697 Eli Zaretskii writes: > On 16 Apr 2002, David Kastrup wrote: > > > > > It is distributed under the GNU General Public License - see the > > > > accompanying COPYING file for more details. > > > > > > The kernel is released under the GNU GPL, but the whole system--the > > > Unix clone--is not. It includes components such as X11, GNU libc, > > > Apache, TeX, etc., which have other licenses. > > > > X11, Apache or TeX are not part of Unix, they just run under it. > > That's debatable. A system without those components would be much > less useful than with them. I.e. it would be much less of ``a > system''. Debatable? For somone that already cried "foul!" if the "Linux" moniker is extended over more than just the kernel proper, it is debatable whether "Unix" should not encompass everything that may be made to run under it? > In any case, since Debian distributes all of these components as > part of a whole, that distribution defines a ``system'', even if > that's not the only possible definition of a system (which seems to > be the cause of your disagreement). And Debian calls it GNU/Linux. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum Email: David.Kastrup@t-online.de