From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13335: 24.1; compilation misparses GNU-style message locations Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:32:18 -0500 Message-ID: References: <8nd2xdwk1b.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1357849989 11108 80.91.229.3 (10 Jan 2013 20:33:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13335@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 10 21:33:26 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TtOoX-0004ZM-TT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 21:33:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50445 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TtOoI-0007fh-0s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:33:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48010) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TtOoC-0007fR-Eh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:33:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TtOo7-0007u3-BA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:33:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49106) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TtOo7-0007tz-7w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:32:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TtOo9-0004Em-OI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:33:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13335 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13335-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13335.135784994516230 (code B ref 13335); Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13335) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jan 2013 20:32:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54570 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TtOnY-0004Dj-La for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:32:25 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:38202 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TtOnW-0004Dc-Mr for 13335@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:32:23 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TtOnS-0000R2-9O; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:32:18 -0500 X-Spook: IDEA ASO New World Order embassy CIDA cypherpunk X-Ran: _[_hZGEj?;)NgbQF_T:2GD2%?]9`k:d{b_%TJ9(.^lwwp#rzPSL#~ X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: ("Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?="'s message of "Thu, 10 Jan 2013 19:52:31 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:69579 Archived-At: Mattias Engdeg=C3=A5rd wrote: >> LINE1-LINE2.COL2 # this seems to be something Emacs made up AFAICS > > Is that something we need to keep, or do you consider it a "regression" > to remove it? It does not look very useful to me (a range of lines but > the same column?). It does look fairly nonsensical... > What about transforming that regexp into rx form, by the way? > Besides being a more readable form (and fewer backslashes), > it would also permit explanatory comments to be put at their natural > places inside. More comments would be good, but could be inserted just as easily by breaking the regexp up using concat, so personally I don't see any need to switch to rx. (I don't always find rx more readable.)