From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20677: tooltips generate garbage Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 09:50:13 +0900 Organization: Faculty of Science, Chiba University Message-ID: References: <556639D1.1030702@alice.it> <83iobdxvzi.fsf@gnu.org> <556C462E.5050906@alice.it> <83a8wjts15.fsf@gnu.org> <556C812C.4030901@alice.it> <83zj4js8nz.fsf@gnu.org> <556CD4EB.8080602@alice.it> <83oakysuu4.fsf@gnu.org> <556D7608.4070006@alice.it> <556D78C6.5070309@alice.it> <83k2vmrwdx.fsf@gnu.org> <876176qg7o.fsf@web.de> <871thuqfv3.fsf@web.de> <87wpzmp0lo.fsf@web.de> <838uc2rspt.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpzm9iiz.fsf@web.de> <836176rkqc.fsf@gnu.org> <87vbf44vtz.fsf@web.de> <83oakwrbdh.fsf@gnu.org> <874mmoragw.fsf@web.de> <83lhg0r4d6.fsf@gnu.org> <831thrqyb4.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433465499 8515 80.91.229.3 (5 Jun 2015 00:51:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 00:51:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, 20677-done@debbugs.gnu.org, angelo.graziosi@alice.it To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 05 02:51:30 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0fqr-0005Xh-Ak for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 02:51:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44818 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0fqq-0006M2-Nj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 20:51:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46497) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0fqn-0006L9-6f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 20:51:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0fqj-0007yV-5h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 20:51:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59187) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0fqj-0007yP-0r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 20:51:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0fqi-0000eh-Es for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 20:51:04 -0400 Resent-From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:51:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 20677 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 20677@debbugs.gnu.org, mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp, angelo.graziosi@alice.it Original-Received: via spool by 20677-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D20677.14334654212428 (code D ref 20677); Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:51:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20677-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jun 2015 00:50:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40925 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0fq0-0000d3-FP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 20:50:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp ([133.82.132.2]:53830) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0fpw-0000cs-Q9 for 20677-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 20:50:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fermat1.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (fermat [192.168.32.10]) by mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D3CC055D; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 09:50:13 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <831thrqyb4.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?UTF-8?Q?Shij=C5=8D?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103583 Archived-At: >>>>> On Thu, 04 Jun 2015 18:37:51 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: >> > So which one of them is better, and should be pushed? >> >> Thanks for testing. The second one is closer to the code before >> the cairo merge, but the first would be better if it works. > I agree that the first patch looks better, as x_clear_area1 sounds > like a helper function. So I suggest that we push that in a couple > of days. I pushed the first patch in dcf18b5. YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp