From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11544: Subject: 24.1.50; ediff-buffers command window does not work properly Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 12:25:23 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4FBCA96C.1070705@gmx.at> <4FBDF8F9.6060908@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1337876786 11720 80.91.229.3 (24 May 2012 16:26:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 16:26:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Munawar Cheema , 11544@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 24 18:26:23 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SXark-0004bh-9v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 18:26:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44311 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SXarj-0001gW-UJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 12:26:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36549) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SXarc-0001eh-OC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 12:26:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SXarW-0000a7-KS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 12:26:12 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60896) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SXarW-0000Zz-Gs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 12:26:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SXasP-0001ye-Me for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 12:27:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 16:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11544 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11544-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11544.13378767857554 (code B ref 11544); Thu, 24 May 2012 16:27:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11544) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 May 2012 16:26:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42209 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SXaro-0001xn-ER for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 12:26:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:47451 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SXarm-0001xf-5J for 11544@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 12:26:22 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SXaqp-0000AP-DY; Thu, 24 May 2012 12:25:23 -0400 X-Spook: Syria BROMURE Area 51 BCCI BLU-114/B warfare Bellcore X-Ran: Uo"mpvk)!BB!ab1]2Ot9Bg)ROO,~j9saE;N"c~YtHztA]\QYO2Gn{wA_3=Wi9gd`53'hpY X-Hue: yellow X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <4FBDF8F9.6060908@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Thu, 24 May 2012 11:01:45 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:60338 Archived-At: martin rudalics wrote: >> I tried emacs 23 and it does the same thing on Ubuntu precise. I use >> emacs on windows and have never seen this problem using ediff there >> if that helps. > > I don't have the slightest idea what's going on so I can only suggest to > try the following: Locate the file ediff-wind.el (in the lisp/vc > subdirectory) and try to apply the patch I attached. At least this way > we should be able to find out whether doing two separate calls of > `modify-frame-parameters' confuses your window manager. My guess (based on no information) would be that this is somehow related to Unity, like http://debbugs.gnu.org/10954