From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ulrich Mueller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35443: 27.0.50; Gnus (nnimap) shows "ghost" messages in summary buffer Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:49:17 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87wojfjxry.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="66481"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 35443@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 27 17:51:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hKPba-000H83-If for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:51:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33490 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hKPbZ-00066L-AJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:51:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55082) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hKPbT-000663-5L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:51:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hKPbS-0006a2-DX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:51:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50477) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hKPbS-0006ZV-8J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:51:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hKPbS-0006XL-5v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ulrich Mueller Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 15:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35443 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35443-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35443.155638023725096 (code B ref 35443); Sat, 27 Apr 2019 15:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35443) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2019 15:50:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35788 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hKPb3-0006Wh-4J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:50:37 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([140.211.166.183]:53792) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hKPb0-0006WS-D0 for 35443@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:50:35 -0400 Original-Received: from a1i15 (host2092.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ulm) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E46E342960; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 15:50:26 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87wojfjxry.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Sat, 27 Apr 2019 08:03:29 -0700") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:158356 Archived-At: >>>>> On Sat, 27 Apr 2019, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > Are you able to build an earlier version of Emacs (say, from a couple > of months ago) and test if you see the same thing? I made some fairly > deep changes to Gnus over the past month, and while I don't see any > reason why that would cause this behavior, it would be nice to rule it > out. Yes, I had tried with Emacs 26.2 and it has the same problem.