From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ulrich Mueller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#68842: 29.2; implicit declaration of function 'XOpenDisplay' Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 10:21:22 +0100 Message-ID: References: <86sf2d1kk4.fsf@gnu.org> <87plxhndzo.fsf@yahoo.com> <86eddw1vnz.fsf@gnu.org> <87eddwoa1l.fsf@yahoo.com> <87y1c4mv4k.fsf@yahoo.com> <86a5ok1rqt.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4423"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: Po Lu , 68842@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 01 10:22:16 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rVTGy-0000yK-0V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 10:22:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rVTGc-00039N-18; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 04:21:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rVTGa-000399-RI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 04:21:52 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rVTGa-0007cY-Gf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 04:21:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rVTGk-0004Aq-1L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 04:22:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ulrich Mueller Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 09:22:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68842 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 68842-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68842.170677930416018 (code B ref 68842); Thu, 01 Feb 2024 09:22:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 68842) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2024 09:21:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40228 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rVTGR-0004AI-VC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 04:21:44 -0500 Original-Received: from woodpecker.gentoo.org ([140.211.166.183]:44008 helo=smtp.gentoo.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rVTGQ-0004A1-8r for 68842@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 04:21:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <86a5ok1rqt.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 01 Feb 2024 11:03:06 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:279269 Archived-At: >>>>> On Thu, 01 Feb 2024, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Thanks. Ulrich, please install the patch on the emacs-29 branch. Will do later today. >> Also FTR this flag isn't a requirement under GCC 4.6. To be accurate, the -b option is gone in GCC 4.6, so we're talking about GCC 4.5 and earlier. (Which won't make any difference for this discussion, I guess.) >> It's only relevant for ancient versions of Binutils on Linux-based >> systems with a.out binaries, which are a rare sight if not >> nonexistent today, considering the exceedingly short half-lives >> of such systems. Yes, but let's go with my minimal patch and include the declaration. Keeping the test won't hurt even if it's pretty much useless.