From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2061: Fwd: Loading .el when newer than .elc Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:03:25 -0500 Message-ID: References: <838uthtymw.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392138248 10448 80.91.229.3 (11 Feb 2014 17:04:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2061@debbugs.gnu.org To: Reuben Thomas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 11 18:04:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WDGkp-0000os-QI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:04:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34891 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDGkp-0006HN-CV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:04:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48928) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDGkg-0005fP-Ez for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:04:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDGkc-0008AY-JT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:04:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46522) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDGkc-0008AT-Fh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:04:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WDGkb-0000HN-R8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:04:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 2061 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2061-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B2061.13921382121033 (code B ref 2061); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2061) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2014 17:03:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47704 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WDGk7-0000Ga-5h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:03:32 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:47053 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WDGk4-0000GK-0R for 2061@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:03:28 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDGk1-00055F-LS; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:03:25 -0500 X-Spook: Skipjack dictionary MP5K-SD high security top secret X-Ran: 4,,8LiWX5Zw"5k*>\vYMr-;+FyC(<2ycx@hX&(Kpw0fq,IT]g!j.?1H[lZ%WQ6/SpI-Ll7 X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Reuben Thomas's message of "Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:37:29 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85390 Archived-At: Reuben Thomas wrote: > Joy! I'm sorry my timing was bad, in that I looked into this after it had > been committed, but before it had been released. That's fine, but why not read the report, especially the close message, before reopening it? http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=2061#106 seems clear to me. Now the OP will wonder why his bug was opened and closed again.