From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11669: 24.1; Build failure on amd64 with x32 ABI Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:52:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20436.63644.849695.332693@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20438.21705.2229.857235@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1339448012 25074 80.91.229.3 (11 Jun 2012 20:53:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11669@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ulrich Mueller Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 11 22:53:31 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SeBc8-0000HP-VQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:53:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33680 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SeBc8-0000PF-OT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:53:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36839) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SeBc6-0000PA-7J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:53:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SeBc4-0002ij-Mm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:53:25 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56992) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SeBc4-0002ic-JX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:53:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SeBec-0003uf-B3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11669 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 11669-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11669.133944812414994 (code B ref 11669); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11669) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jun 2012 20:55:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38305 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SeBe0-0003tm-8i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:55:24 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:59092) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SeBdx-0003tf-Ou for 11669@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:55:22 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SeBbO-0005DE-Ip; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:52:42 -0400 X-Spook: IRA AFSPC CIDA industrial espionage Lexis-Nexis Zachawi X-Ran: nN9ENh{KF=4qpme>2]tt%*iOfTlzoPq+YMkr"pSz/4vZx>xm2$^msK"au,&Tqi;?sK93xV X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <20438.21705.2229.857235@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> (Ulrich Mueller's message of "Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:27:53 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:60874 Archived-At: Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> I wonder if the removal of src/m/ in the trunk means it Just Works >> now? > > Right, I haven't noticed any problems with the trunk. > > Will 24.2 be released from the trunk or from the emacs-24 branch? Effectively from trunk unless something unexpected happens. emacs-24 should get some form of band-aid "do not merge to trunk" fix for this, just in case.