From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andy Moreton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25030: 25.1; Unexpected indentation and syntax-highlighting in `emacs-lisp-mode' Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 12:55:48 +0000 Message-ID: References: <868taptb26.fsf@gmail.com> <87efkftyez.fsf@gmail.com> <86in9rmw6h.fsf@gmail.com> <87a7v3trww.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1521550512 15743 195.159.176.226 (20 Mar 2018 12:55:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 12:55:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.91 (windows-nt) To: 25030@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 20 13:55:08 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eyGnC-0003vg-3Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 13:55:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48360 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eyGpD-0005cn-OX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:57:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48895) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eyGp8-0005cd-0r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:57:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eyGp4-0002YQ-3h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:57:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34947) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eyGp4-0002YM-0N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eyGp3-0000qd-PE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:57:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Andy Moreton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 12:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25030 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug wontfix X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.15215505793196 (code B ref -1); Tue, 20 Mar 2018 12:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Mar 2018 12:56:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42843 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eyGoN-0000pT-CM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:56:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57540) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eyGoL-0000pF-Ny for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:56:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eyGoB-0001rM-5g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:56:12 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:41783) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eyGoB-0001rI-2W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:56:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48495) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eyGo9-00057W-UL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:56:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eyGo6-0001nA-2o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:56:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=45678 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eyGo5-0001lV-S9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:56:02 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eyGlw-0002T1-6Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 13:53:48 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 26 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:9rh+4qi4IZD+dBsYMk6T/fWQLh4= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:144448 Archived-At: On Mon 19 Mar 2018, Noam Postavsky wrote: > Drew Adams writes: > >>> I disagree. The interpreter and byte compiler do not care about the >>> indentation style that you choose for your code: the syntax and >>> semantics are unaffected. >>> >>> Style choices should not produce warnings. An indication that code layout >>> is following an unusual style may be useful, but it should be optional, and >>> it should not use the warning face (it should have a separate face that can >>> be customised independently of the warning face). >> >> What Andy said. This has nothing to do with byte-compiling >> (or interpreting, for that matter). > > I don't understand why you guys are all of a sudden talking about > byte-compiling. The point is that the unusual code layout does not cause any problems for elisp code, and it does not matter if the code is interpreted or byte-compiled: the result is the same, namely that indentation style has no effect on the meaning of the code. AndyM