From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andy Moreton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31245: 27.0.50; Crash in Windows emacs Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 16:47:55 +0100 Message-ID: References: <2de2d2d6-1fb2-59df-860e-36427b063e7c@gmail.com> <83k1syvt69.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1524498427 5676 195.159.176.226 (23 Apr 2018 15:47:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 15:47:07 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (windows-nt) To: 31245@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 23 17:47:03 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fAdgF-0001Od-1E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 17:47:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54108 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fAdiM-0000ct-1X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:49:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60223) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fAdiF-0000cb-80 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:49:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fAdiA-0008Sv-8T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:49:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57585) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fAdiA-0008Sn-4n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fAdi9-0000Dr-RW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:49:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <2de2d2d6-1fb2-59df-860e-36427b063e7c@gmail.com> Resent-From: Andy Moreton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 15:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31245 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.1524498509809 (code B ref -1); Mon, 23 Apr 2018 15:49:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Apr 2018 15:48:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37249 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fAdhc-0000Cw-U6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:48:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40829) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fAdha-0000Ck-Hp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:48:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fAdhU-0008Cx-J1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:48:21 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:41023) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fAdhU-0008Cr-Fz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:48:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60029) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fAdhR-0000Jz-Fc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:48:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fAdhM-0008A6-FE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:48:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=40556 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fAdhM-00086b-6z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:48:12 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fAdf4-0008RN-Qn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 17:45:50 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 33 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:rjbLAtAnMDN52t4Tlm6OfYhZWhA= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:145694 Archived-At: On Mon 23 Apr 2018, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Andy Moreton >> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:51:34 +0100 >> >> I am seeing occasional crashes in emacs, but am currently unable to >> run gdb on my machine at $work. >> >> Decoding emacs_backtrace.txt gives: >> >> w32_backtrace at C:/emacs/git/emacs/master/src/w32fns.c:10645 >> emacs_abort at C:/emacs/git/emacs/master/src/w32fns.c:10680 >> bidi_pop_it at C:/emacs/git/emacs/master/src/bidi.c:946 >> pop_it at C:/emacs/git/emacs/master/src/xdisp.c:6265 >> next_overlay_string at C:/emacs/git/emacs/master/src/xdisp.c:5662 >> set_iterator_to_next at C:/emacs/git/emacs/master/src/xdisp.c:7779 >> move_it_in_display_line_to at C:/emacs/git/emacs/master/src/xdisp.c:9230 >> move_it_to at C:/emacs/git/emacs/master/src/xdisp.c:9480 >> partial_line_height at C:/emacs/git/emacs/master/src/xdisp.c:10047 >> try_window at C:/emacs/git/emacs/master/src/xdisp.c:17759 >> redisplay_window at C:/emacs/git/emacs/master/src/xdisp.c:17181 > > Thanks, but this kind of problems is impossible to debug without a > reproducer. Can you come up with one? Sure, but it will take some time as this only happens every few days. > Also, do all the crashes you see show the same backtrace? As yet unknown, as the backtrace is always written to the same file, so the old ones have been overwritten. AndyM