From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8801: 23.3; debug-on-error destroys edebug sessions Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:28:44 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1307579366 8428 80.91.229.12 (9 Jun 2011 00:29:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 00:29:26 +0000 (UTC) To: 8801-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 09 02:29:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QUT7g-0000x7-Rw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 02:29:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33502 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUT7f-0005wn-P6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:29:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47666) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUT7P-0005wW-MA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:29:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUT7O-0007fc-MO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:29:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41212) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUT7O-0007fY-Ko for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QUT7O-00063k-FJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:29:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 00:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 8801 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 8801@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 8801-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D8801.130757933323271 (code D ref 8801); Thu, 09 Jun 2011 00:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8801-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2011 00:28:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QUT7E-00063I-Ky for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:28:52 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QUT7C-000637-81 for 8801-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:28:50 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56710) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUT76-0004rf-Ta; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:28:44 -0400 X-Spook: Bellcore TWA Syria S Key Merlin UFO EuroFed plutonium X-Ran: EHND5"U@nk4t^}~v$\CoO_BHPW("(v1M/e,*H`iz=~~+!0oEfPaNDs7HBwHI$Y6r+o}vMO X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:29:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:47050 Archived-At: Version: 24.1 Dave Abrahams wrote: > At Mon, 06 Jun 2011 12:52:13 -0300, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> >> AFAIK this long standing problem is fixed in Emacs-24. Can you give >> a specific recipe and try it with Emacs-24? > > From what I can tell, you are right that it's fixed (thanks!) I can't > give a specific recipe ATM, though, sorry. Marking as fixed in 24.1.