* bug#25911: Subject: 26.0.50; Defun apply-partially is in 'Basic Lisp macros'
@ 2017-03-01 8:35 Tino Calancha
2017-03-01 16:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Tino Calancha @ 2017-03-01 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 25911
We might move its definition into 'Basic Lisp functions'.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
From 3b4254f7a37c4dc8418e9a03e91cd233a4180e10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 17:30:52 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] * lisp/subr.el (apply-partially): Move to 'Basic Lisp
functions' section.
---
lisp/subr.el | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lisp/subr.el b/lisp/subr.el
index 4f848d1400..6b0403890c 100644
--- a/lisp/subr.el
+++ b/lisp/subr.el
@@ -132,15 +132,6 @@ defvar-local
(list 'progn (list 'defvar var val docstring)
(list 'make-variable-buffer-local (list 'quote var))))
-(defun apply-partially (fun &rest args)
- "Return a function that is a partial application of FUN to ARGS.
-ARGS is a list of the first N arguments to pass to FUN.
-The result is a new function which does the same as FUN, except that
-the first N arguments are fixed at the values with which this function
-was called."
- (lambda (&rest args2)
- (apply fun (append args args2))))
-
(defmacro push (newelt place)
"Add NEWELT to the list stored in the generalized variable PLACE.
This is morally equivalent to (setf PLACE (cons NEWELT PLACE)),
@@ -344,6 +335,15 @@ frame-configuration-p
(and (consp object)
(eq (car object) 'frame-configuration)))
+(defun apply-partially (fun &rest args)
+ "Return a function that is a partial application of FUN to ARGS.
+ARGS is a list of the first N arguments to pass to FUN.
+The result is a new function which does the same as FUN, except that
+the first N arguments are fixed at the values with which this function
+was called."
+ (lambda (&rest args2)
+ (apply fun (append args args2))))
+
\f
;;;; List functions.
--
2.11.0
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
In GNU Emacs 26.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.8)
of 2017-03-01
Repository revision: 03f64ebbc685d803f9dcbb638c37501e0d6f8340
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* bug#25911: Subject: 26.0.50; Defun apply-partially is in 'Basic Lisp macros'
2017-03-01 8:35 bug#25911: Subject: 26.0.50; Defun apply-partially is in 'Basic Lisp macros' Tino Calancha
@ 2017-03-01 16:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-01 23:34 ` Glenn Morris
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2017-03-01 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tino Calancha; +Cc: 25911
> From: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 17:35:31 +0900
>
> We might move its definition into 'Basic Lisp functions'.
Can you tell why?
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* bug#25911: Subject: 26.0.50; Defun apply-partially is in 'Basic Lisp macros'
2017-03-01 16:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2017-03-01 23:34 ` Glenn Morris
2017-03-01 23:52 ` Glenn Morris
2017-03-02 0:28 ` Tino Calancha
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2017-03-01 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: 25911, Tino Calancha
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> We might move its definition into 'Basic Lisp functions'.
>
> Can you tell why?
Presumably because it's a function, not a macro.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* bug#25911: Subject: 26.0.50; Defun apply-partially is in 'Basic Lisp macros'
2017-03-01 23:34 ` Glenn Morris
@ 2017-03-01 23:52 ` Glenn Morris
2017-03-02 0:29 ` Tino Calancha
2017-03-02 0:28 ` Tino Calancha
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2017-03-01 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 25911, Tino Calancha
PS why even make a bug report for this? Either ignore it or change it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* bug#25911: Subject: 26.0.50; Defun apply-partially is in 'Basic Lisp macros'
2017-03-01 23:52 ` Glenn Morris
@ 2017-03-02 0:29 ` Tino Calancha
2017-03-02 15:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Tino Calancha @ 2017-03-02 0:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Glenn Morris; +Cc: 25911, Tino Calancha
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Glenn Morris wrote:
>
> PS why even make a bug report for this? Either ignore it or change it.
To get suggestion about the proper branch where to do the change:
Emacs-25 or master
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* bug#25911: Subject: 26.0.50; Defun apply-partially is in 'Basic Lisp macros'
2017-03-02 0:29 ` Tino Calancha
@ 2017-03-02 15:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2017-03-02 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tino Calancha; +Cc: 25911
> From: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:29:39 +0900 (JST)
> cc: 25911@debbugs.gnu.org, Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>,
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Glenn Morris wrote:
>
> >
> > PS why even make a bug report for this? Either ignore it or change it.
> To get suggestion about the proper branch where to do the change:
> Emacs-25 or master
Master, of course.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* bug#25911: Subject: 26.0.50; Defun apply-partially is in 'Basic Lisp macros'
2017-03-01 23:34 ` Glenn Morris
2017-03-01 23:52 ` Glenn Morris
@ 2017-03-02 0:28 ` Tino Calancha
2017-03-02 15:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Tino Calancha @ 2017-03-02 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Glenn Morris; +Cc: 25911, Tino Calancha
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Glenn Morris wrote:
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
>>> We might move its definition into 'Basic Lisp functions'.
>>
>> Can you tell why?
>
> Presumably because it's a function, not a macro.
Yes, that's the reason.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* bug#25911: Subject: 26.0.50; Defun apply-partially is in 'Basic Lisp macros'
2017-03-02 0:28 ` Tino Calancha
@ 2017-03-02 15:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-02 23:40 ` Tino Calancha
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2017-03-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tino Calancha; +Cc: 25911
> From: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:28:41 +0900 (JST)
> cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>,
> 25911@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Glenn Morris wrote:
>
> > Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >
> >>> We might move its definition into 'Basic Lisp functions'.
> >>
> >> Can you tell why?
> >
> > Presumably because it's a function, not a macro.
> Yes, that's the reason.
Fine with me. (I don't know why Stefan put it in that particular
place when he moved it from simple.el.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* bug#25911: Subject: 26.0.50; Defun apply-partially is in 'Basic Lisp macros'
2017-03-02 15:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2017-03-02 23:40 ` Tino Calancha
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Tino Calancha @ 2017-03-02 23:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 25911-done
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:28:41 +0900 (JST)
>> cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>,
>> 25911@debbugs.gnu.org
>>
>> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Glenn Morris wrote:
>>
>> > Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> >
>> >>> We might move its definition into 'Basic Lisp functions'.
>> >>
>> >> Can you tell why?
>> >
>> > Presumably because it's a function, not a macro.
>> Yes, that's the reason.
>
> Fine with me. (I don't know why Stefan put it in that particular
> place when he moved it from simple.el.)
>> > PS why even make a bug report for this? Either ignore it or change it.
>> To get suggestion about the proper branch where to do the change:
>> Emacs-25 or master
>Master, of course.
Thanks for the clarification.
Pushed to master as commit 6a9ba271a956127e566192b33fc811e802d2d475
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-03-02 23:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-03-01 8:35 bug#25911: Subject: 26.0.50; Defun apply-partially is in 'Basic Lisp macros' Tino Calancha
2017-03-01 16:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-01 23:34 ` Glenn Morris
2017-03-01 23:52 ` Glenn Morris
2017-03-02 0:29 ` Tino Calancha
2017-03-02 15:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-02 0:28 ` Tino Calancha
2017-03-02 15:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-02 23:40 ` Tino Calancha
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).