From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8006: 23.2.93; rmail-mime says "Not a MIME message" Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:30:11 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83k4has1uv.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322091045 28663 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2011 23:30:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8006@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 24 00:30:41 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTMH1-00023R-VT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:30:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41527 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTMH1-0005h8-G1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:30:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43645) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTMGy-0005h3-HY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:30:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTMGx-0005Wn-51 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:30:36 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34808) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTMGx-0005Wj-2I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:30:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTMIM-0002OJ-8A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:32:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8006 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8006-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8006.13220911089172 (code B ref 8006); Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:32:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8006) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Nov 2011 23:31:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTMI6-0002Nr-1h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:31:47 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTMI2-0002Ni-TI for 8006@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:31:44 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTMGZ-0005BQ-UD; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:30:12 -0500 X-Spook: AUTODIN bluebird 22nd SAS counter terrorism doctrine X-Ran: ][I]b~mrp|F~B&V9XM%vo(/{ (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 09 Feb 2011 06:21:46 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:32:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54238 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> What, do you think, should `v' do for non-MIME message? > > Show the raw message as it is held in the mbox format. That's what it > does for MIME messages, right? No, it does some funny thing of _almost_ showing the raw message, but still hiding the mime boundaries (bug#10078). > In this case, there's nothing to decode, but the toggle can still be > meaningful. The toggle would just be equivalent to rmail-toggle-header, so I really can't see the point of adding such a feature for `v' myself.