From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13448: Cannot build Emacs 24.2.92 Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:26:53 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20130115175931.59dbde1f13cce8bd98fbd08b@gmail.com> <7phamib6y2.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <50F5BEBA.2070802@cs.ucla.edu> <50F60E04.3040004@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358303255 21541 80.91.229.3 (16 Jan 2013 02:27:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 02:27:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Xue Fuqiao , Andreas Schwab , 13448@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 16 03:27:51 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TvIjG-0008PK-S3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 03:27:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57985 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvIj0-0005FO-FP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:27:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37495) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvIix-0005F8-1x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:27:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvIiw-0003OT-5b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:27:30 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56992) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvIiw-0003ON-1z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:27:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvIjS-0001fn-5y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:28:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 02:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13448 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13448-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13448.13583032606398 (code B ref 13448); Wed, 16 Jan 2013 02:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13448) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2013 02:27:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34222 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvIj1-0001ez-1T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:27:40 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:43399) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvIit-0001eh-0l for 13448@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:27:32 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvIiL-000395-AI; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:26:53 -0500 X-Spook: SCUD missile Guantanamo world domination FSF 9/11 pink X-Ran: V17}T7Q/cUh/M4m*x=swEM5;(u@;@C:RgC+&KE0ZP'U]p$N=Fq{~J)&o3G9]'58j3/TVSX X-Hue: blue X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <50F60E04.3040004@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:18:44 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:69853 Archived-At: Paul Eggert wrote: > On 01/15/2013 05:02 PM, Glenn Morris wrote: > >> (It seems confusing if --enable-gcc-warnings actually enables _errors_ >> rather than warnings though.) > > That's what the flag does in other GNU packages. We could change it to > --enable-gcc-errors, I suppose, but if we do that we should change the > name for all packages that use that option in this way. Just changing the description (eg to "lots of GCC warnings/errors") is fine by me.