From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32766: Wrong syntax colors with backslash in a string (F90 mode) Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 11:34:10 -0500 Message-ID: References: <85507699.497150.1537311115648@mail.libero.it> <87k0rqjxug.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2685"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) Cc: 32766@debbugs.gnu.org, Angelo Graziosi To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 02 18:03:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l6z54-0000TL-Px for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 18:03:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40534 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6z53-0007iR-Pf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 12:03:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54140) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6ydq-0002wf-Ht for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 11:35:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52746) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6ydq-000369-9O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 11:35:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6ydq-0003Ug-4w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 11:35:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 16:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32766 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 32766-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32766.161228367213381 (code B ref 32766); Tue, 02 Feb 2021 16:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32766) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Feb 2021 16:34:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36059 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6ydM-0003Tl-3W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 11:34:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35980) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6ydJ-0003TX-86 for 32766@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 11:34:30 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49589) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6ydD-0002nE-Qc; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 11:34:23 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l6yd5-0003fw-CI; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 11:34:16 -0500 X-Spook: HALO Federal Emergency Management Agency NCSA sweeping X-Ran: ZCs}6C3U_6XnmF.fv9sSdyen;~K7un2!DaYdzi*K%N0J'"*toJM3, (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 02 Feb 2021 16:25:27 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:199152 Archived-At: > But I don't really know F90 any more -- would it make sense to flip the > defaults now and make \ non-special? If that happened 21 years ago i > F2K, then perhaps it's time? I haven't kept up with this stuff, but probably you are right. Not quite as long ago as 21 years, but ref eg https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34203 (At one time I hoped to have separate modes for the various Fortran standards, but it never went anywhere, so "f90-mode" should default to whatever is appropriate for recent gfortran, I think.)