From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ulrich Mueller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51327: 28.0.60; emacsclient warns about XDG_RUNTIME_DIR when starting daemon on-demand Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 08:44:10 +0100 Message-ID: References: <53706fa9-1458-fb5c-bd31-15ab555b59e9@gmail.com> <834k7kze0z.fsf@gnu.org> <212e4974-785a-65e0-70cc-fed7ea3ddacf@cs.ucla.edu> <3107b151-c56b-7c8d-7277-cbc39273a401@gmail.com> <835yryx5yf.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1amutcf.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27852"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: jporterbugs@gmail.com, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, stefan@marxist.se, 51327@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 09 08:45:28 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mvE7L-00070K-IU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2021 08:45:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41054 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mvE7J-0000EH-Hi for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2021 02:45:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57420) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mvE6w-0000C0-8v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2021 02:45:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59002) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mvE6v-0003yf-Ng for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2021 02:45:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mvE6v-0006Gv-MO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2021 02:45:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ulrich Mueller Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 07:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51327 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: security patch Original-Received: via spool by 51327-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51327.163903586324029 (code B ref 51327); Thu, 09 Dec 2021 07:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51327) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Dec 2021 07:44:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42309 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mvE6J-0006FV-AE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2021 02:44:23 -0500 Original-Received: from woodpecker.gentoo.org ([140.211.166.183]:54728 helo=smtp.gentoo.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mvE6I-0006FI-0P for 51327@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2021 02:44:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <83r1amutcf.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 09 Dec 2021 09:32:00 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:221984 Archived-At: >>>>> On Thu, 09 Dec 2021, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > If you guys can arrive at something that you-all can live with, we can > make some progress, maybe even for Emacs 28. But if everyone will > just keep saying that any solution except the one he/she suggested is > unacceptable, we have a stalemate, and that's not good for anyone. > So my suggestion to all the participants is to abandon the dogmas and > try to find a compromise which will be acceptable. Bonus points for > finding a compromise that is simple enough to fix this on the release > branch. See my earlier message from 00:19 UTC today? https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=51327#78