From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1117: 23.0.60; Index in Elisp manual has ^M at the end of each line Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:01:33 +0200 Message-ID: References: <008a01c92911$f6510ee0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii , 1117@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1223461833 16682 80.91.229.12 (8 Oct 2008 10:30:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:30:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero , 1117@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 08 12:31:27 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KnWK2-0000d2-4V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:31:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43566 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KnWIx-0001XQ-QC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:30:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KnWIs-0001WG-2N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:30:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KnWIq-0001Ux-IF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:30:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44144 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KnWIq-0001Un-CY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:30:00 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:55194) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KnWIp-0004Y3-No for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:30:00 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m98ATvRU023630; Wed, 8 Oct 2008 03:29:57 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m98AA4be018996; Wed, 8 Oct 2008 03:10:04 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:10:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1117 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1117-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1117.122346013716920 (code B ref 1117); Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:10:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1117) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 8 Oct 2008 10:02:17 +0000 Original-Received: from mtaout5.012.net.il (mtaout5.012.net.il [84.95.2.13]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m98A298P016907 for <1117@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Wed, 8 Oct 2008 03:02:11 -0700 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.3.182]) by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0K8E00JM8ZWJATB2@i_mtaout5.012.net.il> for 1117@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:02:44 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:30:01 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:21268 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:02:40 +0200 > From: "Juanma Barranquero" > Cc: > > > emacs -Q > > C-h i, choose Elisp manual > > g Index takes you to the Index node. > > > > Each line has a visible ^M at the end of it. > > That's surely #876? I thought #876 was resolved long ago. Why wasn't it?