From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#222: isearch-repeat-forward: wrong overlay after failure Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 13:39:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87tzh4rd41.fsf@jurta.org> <1D559CDD-D9EE-42D5-94F3-D7D33B9A1326@gmail.com> <85iqxke9ju.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310233230 27640 80.91.229.12 (9 Jul 2011 17:40:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 17:40:30 +0000 (UTC) To: 222-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 09 19:40:25 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfbVu-0000M3-55 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 19:40:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44268 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfbVs-0007M8-S6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 13:40:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57049) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfbVe-0007KJ-2O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 13:40:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfbVc-0005Hk-1x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 13:40:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55153) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfbVb-0005HF-Vv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 13:40:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfbVb-0005wb-D4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 13:40:03 -0400 Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 17:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 222 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Mail-Followup-To: 222@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 222-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D222.131023316922799 (code D ref 222); Sat, 09 Jul 2011 17:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 222-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2011 17:39:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfbV2-0005vg-Rp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 13:39:29 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfbV1-0005vU-D1 for 222-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 13:39:27 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58242) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfbUv-0002tq-Qi; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 13:39:21 -0400 X-Spook: Abbas FIPS140 quarter cybercash Dick Cheney Elvis Panama X-Ran: `,E@QjE'E'jZVb/KDQd*>,MP/I'C.'!,*/N$.PANWI{=rFu9/l_J!Hypm2)rqnjgOWF|zg X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 12 May 2008 10:41:05 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 13:40:03 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48343 Archived-At: I don't see a need to keep open this particular report, which was marked "wontfix" some time ago. Stefan Monnier wrote: > It's a very general problem: many keybindings used in major-mode or > minor modes only work properly if the corresponding mode is > currently active. > > Of course, many work perfectly in other contexts too, and yet many more > work 98% OK as well. > > I don't think it makes sense to document each and every function > describing whether it's expected to work in other modes or not.