From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2228: 23.0.90; rmail-cease-edit ignores changes to the message headers Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:22:57 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii , 2228@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1234385036 16001 80.91.229.12 (11 Feb 2009 20:43:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:43:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2228@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 11 21:45:11 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LXLxA-00040s-S6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:45:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52935 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LXLvr-0005fV-7w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:43:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LXLvn-0005ds-7b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:43:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LXLvk-0005cz-N4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:43:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35705 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LXLvk-0005cv-Go for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:43:36 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:48324) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LXLvj-0002VZ-Rn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:43:36 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1BKhXXt006923; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:43:34 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n1BKU3P0003362; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:30:03 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs , Rmail Maintainers Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:30:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2228 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,rmail X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2228-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B2228.12343837982073 (code B ref 2228); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:30:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2228) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 11 Feb 2009 20:23:18 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from mtaout2.012.net.il (mtaout2.012.net.il [84.95.2.4]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1BKNEQc002067 for <2228@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:23:15 -0800 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout2.012.net.il by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KEX0000040UAZ00@i_mtaout2.012.net.il> for 2228@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:23:35 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.24.112]) by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KEX00DFT4MZTI70@i_mtaout2.012.net.il>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:23:24 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:43:38 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:25187 Archived-At: > From: Richard M Stallman > CC: rgm@gnu.org, 2228@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com > Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:22:51 -0500 > > Why not? that's what the Babyl Rmail did, so it's obviously not that > bad. > > Yes it was -- that's why I changed it. IMO, we should have our priorities right: first make Rmail no worse than it was before, then improve it. We can even have a release in between. If we keep insisting on perfection, we will never release Emacs 23.1.