From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1348: set-frame-width and set-frame-position seem buggy on at least MSWindows Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:07:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: "uk5ahnm7h.fsf@gnu.org" <4936FD7F.4070900@gmx.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii , 1348@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1228365053 12310 80.91.229.12 (4 Dec 2008 04:30:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 04:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1348@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, jasonr@f2s.com To: grischka Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 04 05:31:46 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L85sO-00016y-9I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:31:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38775 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L85rD-0004ll-Sy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:30:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L85r1-0004hm-Im for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:30:19 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L85r0-0004hC-7o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:30:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37329 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L85qz-0004h7-V2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:30:18 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:40226) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L85qz-0008Mj-Fv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:30:17 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mB44UDUj030391; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:30:13 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mB44F2G9026136; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:15:02 -0800 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1348 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1348-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1348.122836369224811 (code B ref 1348); Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1348) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 4 Dec 2008 04:08:12 +0000 Original-Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il (mtaout6.012.net.il [84.95.2.16]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mB44886X024804 for <1348@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:08:10 -0800 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout6.012.net.il by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KBC00J0030WKG00@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for 1348@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:10:02 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.111.178]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KBC00EX53KOFN60@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:10:01 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <4936FD7F.4070900@gmx.de> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:30:18 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:22935 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:43:27 +0100 > From: grischka > CC: 1348@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, jasonr@f2s.com, > martin rudalics > > You will maybe agree that it makes sense to run this hook as > a consequence from a lisp call to "set-frame-width". No, I don't agree. In Emacs, Lisp calls don't call redisplay directly. They change variables and objects that affect the next redisplay. Redisplay itself is triggered by other events. Any change that doesn't follow this pattern is wrong.