From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#766: 23.0.60; interesting warning during compilation Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 21:18:19 +0300 Message-ID: References: <4762603A-B23E-454E-A43C-422DE5036DC4@Freenet.DE> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii , 766@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1219516065 9279 80.91.229.12 (23 Aug 2008 18:27:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 18:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 766@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, Peter_Dyballa@Freenet.DE To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 23 20:28:37 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KWxqn-0007cD-BR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 20:28:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58163 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KWxpp-0004CD-LF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:27:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KWxpk-00049d-PC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:27:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KWxpj-00047w-AX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:27:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60523 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KWxpj-00047q-2V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:27:31 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:54333) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KWxpi-0007nN-IP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:27:30 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m7NIRREH016154; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:27:28 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m7NIP6lN014978; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:25:06 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 18:25:06 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 766 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 766-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B766.121951550913126 (code B ref 766); Sat, 23 Aug 2008 18:25:06 +0000 Original-Received: (at 766) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 23 Aug 2008 18:18:29 +0000 Original-Received: from mtaout4.012.net.il (mtaout4.012.net.il [84.95.2.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m7NIIP6Q013113 for <766@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:18:26 -0700 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.211.50]) by i_mtaout4.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0K62000O4G7E4ZW1@i_mtaout4.012.net.il> for 766@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 21:18:51 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:27:32 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:19668 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: 766@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, > Peter Dyballa , bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:33:22 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > If someone has suggestions how to avoid this warning without making > > code ugly and unreadable, and preferably without system-dependent > > #ifdef's, I'm all ears. > > EMACS_INT high_ino = s.st_ino >> 31 >> 1; Thanks. Can we be reasonably sure that GCC will not become smart enough some day to flag this as well?