From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: bug#865: 23.0.60; The directory is unsafe today Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:27:05 +0300 Message-ID: References: <48BD642C.5050405@gmail.com> <48BDD155.8060005@gnu.org> <48BF2171.8040101@gnu.org> <48BF5671.1040705@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii , 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220626112 30121 80.91.229.12 (5 Sep 2008 14:48:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:48:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 05 16:49:27 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KbccP-0002wX-8l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:49:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44287 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KbcbP-0007el-69 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:47:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kbcb7-0007Tc-EZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:47:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kbcb5-0007SJ-2X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:47:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47963 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kbcb4-0007SC-SS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:47:38 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:51742) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kbcb4-0004jU-Ii for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:47:39 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m85ElVBD003934; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 07:47:31 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m85EZ61I031817; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 07:35:06 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:35:06 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 865 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 865-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B865.122062484429652 (code B ref 865); Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:35:06 +0000 Original-Received: (at 865) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 5 Sep 2008 14:27:24 +0000 Original-Received: from mtaout4.012.net.il (mtaout4.012.net.il [84.95.2.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m85ERHSo029637 for <865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 07:27:18 -0700 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.211.50]) by i_mtaout4.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0K6Q006G086BJRX0@i_mtaout4.012.net.il> for 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:27:55 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:47:40 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:20197 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:22985 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 15:18:55 +0200 > From: "Lennart Borgman" > Cc: "Stefan Monnier" , emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org > > I did a test on the directory where I had trouble. I did something like > > (set-file-modes "serv2" ?\654) > > CACLS still reports the same ACL entries. > > I thought that maybe was because the owner is the group > Administrators. However changing the owner to me and trying > set-file-modes again gave the same result. > > Am I perhaps not using set-file-modes correctly? (I get no errors.) set-file-modes is only very crudely emulated on Windows. In a nutshell, the underlying primitive _chmod only considers the high 3 bits of the argument you pass to set-file-modes.