From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: bug#865: 23.0.60; The directory is unsafe today Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:13:02 +0300 Message-ID: References: <48BD642C.5050405@gmail.com> <48BF2171.8040101@gnu.org> <48BF5671.1040705@gnu.org> <48C14226.7080600@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii , 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220635673 27242 80.91.229.12 (5 Sep 2008 17:27:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 17:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 05 19:28:47 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kbf6y-0003fZ-6e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:28:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44823 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kbf5z-0000ZS-1A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:27:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kbf5s-0000V6-Ef for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:27:36 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kbf5r-0000TF-5Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:27:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36372 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kbf5q-0000Sw-PC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:27:34 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:49427) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kbf5p-0003HN-VP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:27:34 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m85HRVMA027384; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 10:27:31 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m85HK86S024632; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 10:20:08 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:20:07 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 865 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 865-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B865.122063484422592 (code B ref 865); Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:20:07 +0000 Original-Received: (at 865) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 5 Sep 2008 17:14:04 +0000 Original-Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il (mtaout6.012.net.il [84.95.2.16]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m85HE0vU022480 for <865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 10:14:01 -0700 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.211.50]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0K6Q003QSFUVYEC0@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:13:50 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:27:35 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:20205 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:22990 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 17:16:46 +0200 > From: "Lennart Borgman" > Cc: 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, "Eli Zaretskii" , > emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org > > On 9/5/08, Jason Rumney wrote: > > Lennart Borgman wrote: > > > I thought that perhaps a workaround would be to changed the owner so I > > tested. > > > > > > I did a test on the directory where I had trouble. I did something like > > > > > > (set-file-modes "serv2" ?\654) > > > > > > > > > > set-file-modes is just a wrapper for the chmod system function. On Windows, > > the chmod system function ignores all fields in the bitmask except the owner > > read and write flags, which it maps to the DOS readonly flag on files. > > Thanks. But then we can not make very much on w32, can we? Of course, we can. We just need to use native NT security APIs, not the emulated Posix ones.