From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: Emacs exited with message =?utf-8?b?4oCcWA==?= protocol error: =?utf-8?b?QmFkUGl4bWFw4oCd?= Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 06:07:33 +0300 Message-ID: References: <86odhdh7ke.fsf@macs.hw.ac.uk> <86y7ggfwhx.fsf@macs.hw.ac.uk> <86ps1sf1sa.fsf@macs.hw.ac.uk> <86odhbdv5l.fsf@macs.hw.ac.uk> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1187060867 556 80.91.229.12 (14 Aug 2007 03:07:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 03:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org To: Joe Wells Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 14 05:07:45 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IKmky-0006zH-IV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 05:07:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IKmky-0002sk-5X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:07:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IKmkv-0002sY-5B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:07:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IKmkt-0002sK-Nt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:07:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IKmkt-0002sH-IZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:07:39 -0400 Original-Received: from heller.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.23]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IKmks-0005hJ-ER; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:07:38 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-53-103.inter.net.il [83.130.53.103]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id DJD73736 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 14 Aug 2007 06:07:32 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <86odhbdv5l.fsf@macs.hw.ac.uk> (message from Joe Wells on Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:41:42 +0100) X-Detected-Kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:16352 Archived-At: > Cc: rms@gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org > From: Joe Wells > Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:41:42 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: Joe Wells > >> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:20:53 +0100 > >> Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org > >> > >> Sorry, I'm not going to run Emacs under GDB indefinitely just on the > >> off chance Emacs will crash. > > > > Why not? As long as Emacs doesn't crash, you will not notice any > > difference in behavior or performance--GDB is simply invisible until > > there's some event that is noteworthy for the debugger. > > I'm not going to run every program on my system under the debugger > forevermore on the off chance that the program might crash! You just reiterated what you said before, but didn't explain why. Can you say why you don't like the idea? I tried to point out that a debugger will stay out of your way as long as the program runs normally, so you should not see any ill effects.