From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2137: 23.0.60; Saving Rmail buffer does not show the "Saving file ..." message Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:29:17 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii , 2137@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233773201 14074 80.91.229.12 (4 Feb 2009 18:46:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:46:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, rms@gnu.org To: 2137@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 04 19:47:55 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LUmmv-0008E5-2h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:47:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46569 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LUmlc-0002Bo-6l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:46:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LUmim-0000rW-8I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:43:36 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LUmil-0000rE-TD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:43:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41728 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LUmil-0000r8-KL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:43:35 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:42854) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LUmik-0000ht-C6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:43:34 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n14IhVXE004923; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:43:32 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n14IZ3DE002556; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:35:03 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs , Rmail Maintainers Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2137 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,rmail X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2137-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B2137.12337721681283 (code B ref 2137); Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2137) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 4 Feb 2009 18:29:28 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from mtaout2.012.net.il (mtaout2.012.net.il [84.95.2.4]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n14ITO1p001277 for <2137@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:29:26 -0800 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout2.012.net.il by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KEK008000K64O00@i_mtaout2.012.net.il> for 2137@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:29:42 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.158.130]) by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KEK00EW30PGD660@i_mtaout2.012.net.il>; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:29:42 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:43:35 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:24946 Archived-At: > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: rms@gnu.org, 2137@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com > > Btw, isn't there's one more misfeature with write-region due to > rmail-write-region-annotate: if you use write-region to save a portion > of the current message to a file, would Rmail do that from the message > collection buffer instead? To answer myself: no, rmail-write-region-annotate does nothing if write-region is invoked with its START argument non-nil (which means to write only a portion of the current buffer). So in this case, the current message will be written to the file using buffer-file-coding-system, as the user should expect. Sorry for the noise.