From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christopher Dimech Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45068: [PATCH] 28.0.50; Update Modus themes 1.0.2 (backward-incompatible) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:32:55 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87im9fgm27.fsf@protesilaos.com> <87zh2ozer4.fsf@tcd.ie> <87ft4edret.fsf@protesilaos.com> <87zh2ldgtf.fsf@protesilaos.com> <87k0toof83.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83wnxo1mcr.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22290"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: contovob@tcd.ie, info@protesilaos.com, 45068@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Stefan Kangas , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 11 15:34:37 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1knjVE-0005gV-Ln for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:34:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58860 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knjVD-0004jg-Nt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:34:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41316) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knjUg-0004Uf-OJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:34:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knjUg-0004EJ-Eq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:34:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1knjUg-0006C7-CW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Christopher Dimech Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 14:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45068 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 45068-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45068.160769718623732 (code B ref 45068); Fri, 11 Dec 2020 14:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45068) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2020 14:33:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40691 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1knjTm-0006Ai-BG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:33:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:58711) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1knjTk-0006A5-JO for 45068@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:33:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1607697175; bh=C+LQggv8XATJ05StSCL5CxLyhw76O0FzP990lzWOa6g=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=KGnHAny6XmDipAeN1KtMFtF88DMvTJxj5+v3MAWQUGpRRmlEU7MOfYP1OpbHKFegq xhq7HHu8To51JTXK51oEv8cmdMaQu9AcKkN8n4Iw0OZwxxI6suMqxV8G+1bnyYMOZm ADZ+HFGXsiMdgMLEJi2fM0lWEZSYGZVv+Cfl5c3s= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [213.165.168.94] ([213.165.168.94]) by web-mail.gmx.net (3c-app-mailcom-bs06.server.lan [172.19.170.174]) (via HTTP); Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:32:55 +0100 Importance: normal Sensitivity: Normal In-Reply-To: X-UI-Message-Type: mail X-Priority: 3 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:N3UpgeCoOLKv+m45lbVF7BUjarJbppvbLcikLCs4GVzLxGGvNzbxQTUJTjZ4OonqdqVB7 /Ip5mKwVOgWLmKsHWJiS4jeRJrfy8wTtag11YabIFI452tIrDLK/p2HTOsQsnqEn2HmBQHKjpwxe yYOLvsiYfryaNTt9NRLtehcYiexwzb0UPH4MuX4dtGvWLm2dig3G67DZ/qLP1z37cZ3MBKCbC//U V6YpwIbBSNJd9TE0aArGuyV+L61zau6tOExLyT8GZwtBh89bPTbcV95YfFBfHOX3gSGPEWdJDuSr Tw= X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:k68rk/5sOsM=:UjIxULN3W+bGz2xXTqNa7r Sh8fwTWUzeGIwSpFXnCNpTz3JfYAitXVwTGzabfqX554kOxZ0XjLZ+iuO9h/kxeFBoPpQzb0s AjxOpO8yzCXu4f77IpPVnHoKDmzrBW3v3FFgtZIQGERvS94glk/bqDukHmw+OXC4MMQ8C9WkH 15rBrJCmnN/ziDrFyvmiBDm5TI0Lms/IL1yXt9s+NzcD2Q+rxBIzhGWphB3kvd8o07zaZifoT Fkq4cOo77Ug0XDtez+r0OU4nnIGhuWTkUZoUtEji49Qbbg1Yodkg6DzhwEd0197dcX22om7L7 jeUfUjCME+MeuCcb+dYxKYtkG0jN9ENM2GqzLBG5wxCLmplo1IyJ3ZYyedDws3owQohJwDB32 DboH5l3styxEYukGqwN1UtAvcBuTaYqwzJgJgpHN6j1ApVcm7PbORimy45425BzyehkoRfxXr 4LyaazchsMJmeHEuLileU/CWX979cdQFhlKV0RboYIfhCXeKtrdOoDJYh2cltDQJ8uMEnAZG2 4vq0oN3CYx+IR6dp1tOKA6M9hcaAVD3ZqJusSNGtUT4C+5RHxOFZhlAtyH6Y7TlqA/8bFEXIt naitICsYrRpcQ= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195760 Archived-At: > Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 at 3:16 PM > From: "Stefan Kangas" > To: "Eli Zaretskii" > Cc: contovob@tcd.ie, info@protesilaos.com, 45068@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@l= inkov.net > Subject: bug#45068: [PATCH] 28.0.50; Update Modus themes 1.0.2 (backward= -incompatible) > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> Taking a step back, why are any themes in "etc/themes" to begin with? > > > > This question should have been asked 10 years ago, when we added that > > place. > > I wasn't paying attention 10 years ago, I'm afraid. :-) > > > Nowadays I think the question is what's so wrong with that > > place that would justify moving the files. If there are no serious > > problems, I'd prefer to keep using that directory for themes. > > Right. Well, I don't exactly have a strong opinion either way. But I > do think that we should be consistent: it would be confusing to have > some themes in "etc/themes" and some in "lisp/themes". > > If we can't move all themes to "lisp/themes" and we don't want to use > "lisp/themes" just for support files, to my mind the only remaining way > forward is to add some way to byte-compile (perhaps only some?) files in > "etc/themes". And then make sure they can be loaded, are installed with > Emacs, etc. > > Does that sound good, or could we do even better here? > > Protesilaos, what do you think? Does it sound workable for you? We can have a subset of the themes in "lisp/themes", the rest in "etc/them= es". I suggest that Protesilaos' Modus-Themes be used as default for emacs (sto= red in "lisp/themes") because they are acessible themes for Gnu Emacs that muc= h thought was spent conforming with WCAG AAA Standard. Regards Christopher