From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christopher Dimech Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45068: [PATCH] 28.0.50; Update Modus themes 1.0.2 (backward-incompatible) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 21:21:58 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87im9fgm27.fsf@protesilaos.com> <87ft4edret.fsf@protesilaos.com> <87zh2ldgtf.fsf@protesilaos.com> <87k0toof83.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83wnxo1mcr.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9d81khh.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtyk1hq3.fsf@gnu.org> <87czzgbapt.fsf@protesilaos.com> <83lfe4192f.fsf@gnu.org> <83im9814oh.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11518"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: contovob@tcd.ie, info@protesilaos.com, 45068@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Kangas , juri@linkov.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 11 21:23:43 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1knox5-0002tL-LP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 21:23:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53692 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knox4-0007U2-FV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:23:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35588) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knowQ-0007R8-5F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60024) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knowP-0005vK-Rr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:23:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1knowP-00015j-Og for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:23:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Christopher Dimech Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 20:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45068 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 45068-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45068.16077181314105 (code B ref 45068); Fri, 11 Dec 2020 20:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45068) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2020 20:22:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43334 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1knovb-000149-Hr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:22:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:43195) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1knovY-00013u-T6 for 45068@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:22:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1607718118; bh=nJSiIEVJhQaMoCvp5yFvFVM7eIhkdO1dx/EaRJM6M/0=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=BBLJKmtxfpumio+A41a2nXwzepqBn7aBwnicpG6dqYD460YZh0JLCg09cHqOssGAe GVbclF74p52N1z2FgwQPIZxAdmsw5qngLh7vnSpOWfZyqQ8IdYqNoJAmMLXiEmxwS2 WP8vuwgB7v9lAlb4cpPH9Hl2TAARKy+SK2h0yhD0= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [213.165.168.94] ([213.165.168.94]) by web-mail.gmx.net (3c-app-mailcom-bs06.server.lan [172.19.170.174]) (via HTTP); Fri, 11 Dec 2020 21:21:58 +0100 Importance: normal Sensitivity: Normal In-Reply-To: <83im9814oh.fsf@gnu.org> X-UI-Message-Type: mail X-Priority: 3 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:rAeZm0wKfwrOJMiapNC9d67oq62CCMSZy790xboKHp3ws7jlkeu0J/fKldRLNIDqADmra 68VH4UFTNHpFxLh26aCVu6rB8TEL6EfLH64Kq0ysKCnbQGdtYEWtmFsa0ClVeJL6BhEWOvAwht7q d9HyUyjFKkp00kqaiG533fkPhoqnXeQr7LCWjRHA3fFIa5cyKBKoocrfUe3EN9alfcS9P6ellyQs U3BkWaMe/1G9wWneTPSKRwRrR3ui1xmIlY17bI/Q4+ZIJnFveEWsQ+/sGHixo/ecbqWNrwtP5YU6 LE= X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:GDYV0mxJTXc=:ingytASyJGkj4Jko8HP/QI KD5OX2UvznqEjQdqg7bxmuQwUHj+5HRRYekvPbCKyt99/NYpNWVi13beg4bgScEKiKqAzyxeQ ulxr8mRnyA78pEu6KAmu+75BY/yBfydbkPdsaZ3BNezFc9gLqJuEzD8hANyVtViseqkprmCjv v1QPE+TXQxLSxIIkTNsY8BxKt6QycHzhPgs7O1av2lkN7g8TLDIKZQsi8NwkSg8qdjYqTqMnV rdtkYPA+wVdxecXWSr30BWWvpiC1QdPU6lt47WwNP8PvvtIZgDSuZf4HF9ii+6CD2bIbv5/UQ iF1zW5nd1TDA8CxzWJA+K6bXvmf3DtkyO3L+pFWBArd7smiMBlsZ+C0NtDwqso30ihXB6mWxi 4+ZbaLXFJH0PshdnggwVX4x7A0TDkxxOevYiPmVUX60AgSG5llrjEI40P/XJEbi68LRnpEAqc 92LqGRoGv6x/PsBbK3tQdaa1Rd5QkX675CqKzyHzpJlW8r7gWpbiOTQts37W5sDdHrLQYwYx3 FmpUyFtBUgqQxt4uUh/xga0oyVJ5MY3otZcTvBPPTKr/oR7TazQKIe0ext/hCx5d0YnF2KjSG I90l6gM9e6ZfM= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195806 Archived-At: > Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 at 9:14 PM > From: "Eli Zaretskii" > To: "Stefan Kangas" > Cc: contovob@tcd.ie, info@protesilaos.com, 45068@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@l= inkov.net > Subject: bug#45068: [PATCH] 28.0.50; Update Modus themes 1.0.2 (backward= -incompatible) > > > From: Stefan Kangas > > Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 13:08:19 -0600 > > Cc: juri@linkov.net, contovob@tcd.ie, 45068@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > > > . don't consider this a "theme", but a normal Lisp package (since = it > > > basically violates the conventions for writing a theme) > > > > I guess such violations of our old conventions are getting increasingl= y > > common in (third-party) Emacs theme development. > > Then maybe the best way is to provide that require-theme function I > proposed. I would think so.