From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#4895: 23.1; Incorrect font selected Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:10:30 +0900 Message-ID: References: <5f0660120911092215v48f00477l5f2c68855507ab4b@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Kenichi Handa , 4895@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1257841683 1606 80.91.229.12 (10 Nov 2009 08:28:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 4895@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: =?UTF-8?B?0JDQvdC00YDQtdC5INCf0LDRgNCw0LzQvtC90L7Qsg==?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 10 09:27:56 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N7m4v-0003Wz-JS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:27:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57922 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N7m4u-0004d4-K7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:27:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7m4W-0004Tj-7u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:27:28 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7m4Q-0004Qx-MR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:27:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38423 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N7m4Q-0004Qo-2M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:27:22 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:49962) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N7m4O-0000P0-PW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:27:21 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nAA8RHIQ030705; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:27:18 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nAA8F3LJ029215; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:15:03 -0800 Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:15:03 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Kenichi Handa Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:15:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4895 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 4895-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B4895.125784063428915 (code B ref 4895); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:15:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 4895) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Nov 2009 08:10:34 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp (mx1.aist.go.jp [150.29.246.133]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nAA8AWv8028912 for <4895@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:10:34 -0800 Original-Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id nAA8AVLn015145; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:10:31 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp1.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id nAA8AVm9007539; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:10:31 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id nAA8AUeK011159; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:10:30 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N7lo6-0005sX-IN; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:10:30 +0900 In-Reply-To: <5f0660120911092215v48f00477l5f2c68855507ab4b@mail.gmail.com> (message from =?UTF-8?B?0JDQvdC00YDQtdC5INCf0LDRgNCw0LzQvtC90L7Qsg==?= on Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:15:33 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:27:27 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:32510 Archived-At: In article <5f0660120911092215v48f00477l5f2c68855507ab4b@mail.gmail.com>, =?UTF-8?B?0JDQvdC00YDQtdC5INCf0LDRgNCw0LzQvtC90L7Qsg==?= writes: > Thanks for the explanation. Do you think it's still valid not to > prefer unicode fonts to fonts with specific registries? I believe the > unicode is dominating by now, at least for european languages. I'm not sure. At least, a while ago, bitmap fonts of legacy registries (e.g. iso8859-X, koi8, etc) are better than unicode bitmap fonts. I think using cp1251 fonts for cp1251-encoded file is a good default even now. First of all, if unicode is dominating by now, the chance of reading cp1251 files should be rare. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org