From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11182: 24.0.93; In *shell* buffer, '?' can't be inserted after TAB. Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 09:17:37 +0900 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1333671523 16763 80.91.229.3 (6 Apr 2012 00:18:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 00:18:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11182@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 06 02:18:42 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SFwsv-0007Ig-GG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 02:18:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57762 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFwsp-0002Gf-TD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 20:18:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:32855) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFwsm-0002Fw-KW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 20:18:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFwsk-0005wb-Ti for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 20:18:28 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45334) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFwsk-0005wT-Qg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 20:18:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SFwtJ-00084q-Ql for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 20:19:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Kenichi Handa Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 00:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11182 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11182-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11182.133367150030999 (code B ref 11182); Fri, 06 Apr 2012 00:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11182) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Apr 2012 00:18:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41872 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SFwsd-00083w-Qf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 20:18:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]:41519) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SFwsa-00083n-Nz for 11182@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 20:18:18 -0400 Original-Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id q360HdQ4027767; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 09:17:39 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp3.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id q360HcmL015018; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 09:17:38 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp3.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id q360Hbl9018495; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 09:17:37 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:10:38 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:58537 Archived-At: In article , Stefan Monnier writes: > > This is with the latest trunk emacs. > > In *shell* buffer, if I have files temp1, temp2, temp.txt, > > and type as this ( means the TAB key): > > % rm temp > > *Completions* buffer pops up and lists temp1, temp2, temp.txt. > > But after that, when I type '?' key, ? is not inserted in the buffer > > because C-h c ? tells that it runs completion-help-at-point. This is > > very annoying. What I want to do is to delete only temp1 and temp2 by > > typing "rm temp?". > It's not a bug it's a feature. > You can use `C-q ?' of course. Ah, that's what "the standard completion UI" in NEWS means. Ummm, I don't like it. What annoys me most is that it's very difficult to find when '?' is bound to completion-help-at-point. Are there any easy way to customize Emacs not to bind '?' to completion-help-at-point? --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org