From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8006: 23.2.93; rmail-mime says "Not a MIME message" Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 13:49:48 +0900 Message-ID: References: <83k4has1uv.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297227982 24036 80.91.229.12 (9 Feb 2011 05:06:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 05:06:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8006@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 09 06:06:15 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pn2Fr-0003cL-By for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 06:06:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43338 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pn2Fq-0001bq-JC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:06:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48254 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pn2Fk-0001bl-FO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:06:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pn2Fj-0005bk-7h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:06:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50017) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pn2Fj-0005bg-5y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:06:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pn1sQ-0003Cm-6e; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 23:42:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Kenichi Handa Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 04:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8006 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8006-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8006.129722647212262 (code B ref 8006); Wed, 09 Feb 2011 04:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8006) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2011 04:41:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pn1rb-0003Bj-Vb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 23:41:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pn1rY-0003BJ-NS for 8006@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 23:41:10 -0500 Original-Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p194nnn0012570; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:49:49 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp3.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p194nnK2007590; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:49:49 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp3.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p194nmcY028634; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:49:48 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pn1zw-0002Ys-Gg; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 13:49:48 +0900 In-Reply-To: <83k4has1uv.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:33:28 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 23:42:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:44013 Archived-At: In article <83k4has1uv.fsf@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii writes: > It seems like iff a message doesn't have the Mime-Version header, > typing `v' (rmail-mime) in the Rmail buffer signals an error "Not a > MIME message". Is this expected? Yes > Sounds like a misfeature to me. What, do you think, should `v' do for non-MIME message? --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org