From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9621: 24.0.90; a characger not displayed Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:01:02 +0900 Message-ID: References: <20110927.155802.49633926.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317261735 11642 80.91.229.12 (29 Sep 2011 02:02:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9621@debbugs.gnu.org To: William Xu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 29 04:02:11 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R95wu-00035B-UI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 04:02:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48042 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R95wu-0007hc-C1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:02:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38097) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R95wr-0007hQ-JE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:02:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R95wq-0001X3-CP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:02:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60334) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R95wq-0001Wz-An for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:02:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R95xl-0005p0-SI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:03:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Kenichi Handa Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9621 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9621-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9621.131726172722317 (code B ref 9621); Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:03:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9621) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Sep 2011 02:02:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R95wt-0005nt-Bg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:02:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R95wp-0005nk-Nc for 9621@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:02:05 -0400 Original-Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p8T213cB020248; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:01:04 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp3.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p8T213ai002923; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:01:03 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp3.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p8T2125d023853; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:01:02 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) In-Reply-To: <21glmxdouaq6.fsf@gmail.com> (message from William Xu on Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:12:33 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:03:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51973 Archived-At: In article <21glmxdouaq6.fsf@gmail.com>, William Xu writes: > The real problem is that when the selected font(like BatangChe here) > doesn't contain all the glyphs for the unicode range it covers, emacs > doesn't select a fallback font, like Arial Unicode MS here. Really? I remember that I wrote a code to search for another font in such a case. > Only if one day the following code could be implemented?.. > int > w32font_has_char (Lisp_Object entity, int c) > { > /* We can't be certain about which characters a font will support until > we open it. Checking the scripts that the font supports turns out > to not be reliable. */ > return -1; Even if the above function is not fully implemented, the current font selection code should try to open the font and do another check. It seems that the mechanism is not working well on Windows. Please show me the info I asked in the previous mail (the procedure starting from (setq font-log nil)). --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org